Robert Boyer of UNC-Charlotte discusses his new article on the hurdles surrounding building environmentally friendly Ecovillages. Follow Journal of Planning Education and Research @JPER7.
Robert Boyer guest blogs about his new article in JPER, which is a case study of EcoVillage at Ithaca as an example of socio technical experimentation in planning and community building.
EcoVillage at Ithaca (EVI) is amongst the oldest and widely respected cohousing projects in the United States. Situated in the Town of Ithaca, New York, EVI consists of three tightly-clustered residential neighborhoods with direct access to over 100 acres of open space, two community-supported farms, and several independent businesses. The land consists of five parcels, each owned by a separate non-profit entity, and controlled by the consensus decisions of neighborhood inhabitants. A combination of energy-conserving design and cooperative, low-impact lifestyles results in measurably lower ecological footprints without sacrifice to quality of life. Indeed, residences in the project’s newest neighborhood are net-zero energy consumers, meaning they produce as much energy as they consume.
Perhaps most encouraging is that EVI’s educational non-profit, Learn@EVI, has teamed up with county planners to secure funding from the EPA’s Climate Showcase Communities program. The grant funding (awarded in 2010) is being used to replicate EVI’s successes in a mainstream market setting. To date, this has involved (1) the development of a zoning category that will facilitate future cohousing-style development in the region; (2) the recruitment of a residential development company that has embraced EVI’s model for a new affordable housing project in the Town of Ithaca; and (3) the monitoring of several existing cohousing cooperatives in the region.
What can planners learn from this encouraging episode? Firstly, this grassroots/municipal partnership did not emerge overnight. It has taken twenty-five years for EVI to evolve from a cross-continental activist march (1990), to an experimental housing development (1991-2000), to an important partner in Ithaca’s broad environmental community (2001-present), to a model for sustainable housing recognized by local, state, and federal government officials (2010-present). While EVI’s founders did not confront categorical opposition at the outset, they struggled for years to fit their idealistic vision into local land use regulations, legal vehicles for residential development, and typical financial models. Their project was, by many measures, non-rational and “niche”, requiring a disproportionate investment in time and resources. This leads to a second important lesson: successful climate mitigation is unlikely to be a rational-linear pursuit. Some of the most creative solutions may appear messy or imperfect precisely because what “makes sense” is often an outgrowth of an auto-oriented regime.
As communities nation-wide confront pressures and opportunities to lower carbon emissions, planners can benefit by collaborating with low-carbon initiatives that have existed, perhaps in the margins, for decades. There are hundreds of ecovillages and cohousing projects around the world engaged in willful experimentation in the built environment. Unfortunately, such projects often have no choice but to settle in remote rural locations, on cheap land with no zoning or building regulations, but most are working hard to spread the word. Perhaps the time has come for planners and other local officials to invite such willful experimentation into local planning processes.
The full article by Dr. Boyer can be found here:
Post Author: Robert Boyer.
Dr Boyer is Assistant Professor in the Department of Geography & Earth Sciences at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where he teaches courses in urban planning and sustainability. He is a recent Ph.D. graduate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Where 2024 Presidential Candidates Stand on 12 Issues Important to Urban Planners
Whether you’re yet undecided or have already cast your early vote, here is a roundup of the key positions of Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump on important urban planning policies.
Amtrak Expanding Service in California’s Central Valley
Amtrak is planning a major expansion to the passenger rail lines connecting the Central Valley and the Bay Area.
Progressive Planning in Ideologically Conservative Communities
Planners must work in diverse political environments including conservative jurisdictions that are skeptical of new issues and perspectives. Here are ways to reconcile conflicting goals.
San Francisco Implements ‘Daylighting’ at Intersections
Vehicles are prohibited from parking within 20 feet of a crosswalk as part of the city’s Vision Zero efforts to eliminate traffic deaths and make roads safer.
Washington Voters Keep Carbon Tax
An initiative that would have ended the state’s “cap and invest” program failed, leaving the program in place.
The Future of Electric Vehicles Under Trump
Will Elon Musk’s influence temper Trump’s anti-EV stance?
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
University of Southern California
City of Meridian
University of Calgary
American Planning Association, Sustainable Communities Division
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
Detroit Regional Partnership
San Joaquin LAFCo
City of South Portland