A new study conducted by former Boston Mayor Tom Menino and the Initiative on Cities at Boston University surveyed 70 mayors on their challenges, policy agendas, and relationships.
During his 20 year tenure as mayor of Boston, Tom Menino chatted with many different mayors on their experiences in city government. Driven by these conversations, Menino spearheaded a nationally representative study of American mayors on policy priorities and challenges, controlling for city size and political party.
Often seen as more nimble than federal bureaucrats, mayors are cited as not letting partisan politics influence their policies. Despite this, as Alexis Stephens of Next City discusses, there are key differences between Republican and Democratic mayors in this study.
In general, mayors cited aging infrastructure and fiscal, budgeting concerns as their top two challenges. However, as Stephens writes: "Breaking down the same answers by political affiliation exposes a divide on priorities... with Republican mayors emphasizing 'economic development' challenges, and financial management at the head of the list for Democratic mayors."
Overwhelmingly, the most obvious policy discrepancies between Democratic and Republican mayors were more ideological. "The surveyors also asked the mayors whether the government should try to close the gap between rich and poor, even if it came at the expense of businesses and/or the affluent. Republican mayors overwhelmingly were opposed (almost 90 percent), while more than half of the Democrats agreed with the tradeoff approach... This might have to do with the different challenges, particularly fiscal, that Democratic mayors are facing."
With regard to economic health, the study also found that mayors from poorer cities were more likely to "support gentrification"— an increase in property values even at the expense of displacing the city's poor— than mayors of wealthier cities.
FULL STORY: What Keeps U.S. Mayors Awake at Night?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)