A recent survey of the Initiative on Global Markets Economic Experts Panel found clear and broad support for the economic benefits of transportation network companies.
Writing for the Washington Post, Emily Badger shares news of the latest survey of the Initiative on Global Markets Economic Experts Panel. The survey questioned the panel on the economic benefits of transportation network companies like Uber and Lyft.
In setting the context for the debate that inspired the survey, Justin Wolfers writes for the New York Times that the arguments of competitor services (i.e., taxis and limousines) "dress their naked self-interest in the guise of public policy concerns."
The question for the economists, according to Wolfers, is "do the economists buy it?" And "[should] regulators restrict the prices, the number of drivers or the available routes available to Uber and its brethren?""
In asking whether "letting car services such as Uber or Lyft compete with taxi firms on equal footing regarding genuine safety and insurance requirements, but without restrictions on prices or routes, raises consumer welfare," the survey found cler support for competition. According to Wolfers, "the responses varied only in the intensity with which they agreed. Of the 40 economists who responded, 60 percent 'strongly agree,' 40 percent 'agree,' and none chose 'uncertain,' 'disagree' and 'strongly disagree.'"
Both articles include quotes from some of the surveyed economists, who provide more insight into their support for competition in the market, as well as charts providing visual evidence of the survey's consensus.
FULL STORY: Taxi Competition
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
World's Largest Wildlife Overpass In the Works in Los Angeles County
Caltrans will soon close half of the 101 Freeway in order to continue construction of the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing near Agoura Hills in Los Angeles County.
U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause
A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.
California Grid Runs on 100% Renewable Energy for Over 9 Hours
The state’s energy grid was entirely powered by clean energy for some portion of the day on 37 out of the last 45 days.
New Forecasting Tool Aims to Reduce Heat-Related Deaths
Two federal agencies launched a new, easy-to-use, color-coded heat warning system that combines meteorological and medical risk factors.
AI Traffic Management Comes to Dallas-Fort Worth
Several Texas cities are using an AI-powered platform called NoTraffic to help manage traffic signals to increase safety and improve traffic flow.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.