Would you be willing to increase the annual license fee you pay on your vehicle if the funds were to go to road repair and expansion? That's the question Californians will be asked to decide if the Road Repairs Act qualifies for the Nov. 2014 ballot.
Known as the vehicle license fee (VLF), it had historically been set at 2 percent of a vehicle's resale value until a budget surplus caused then-Gov. Pete Wilson to reduce it to 0.65 percent in 1998. When the economy tanked, Gov. Gray Davis restored it to 2 percent in June, 2003, prompting his recall. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger promptly rolled it back to .65 percent in Nov., 2003, creating a $6 billion structural budget deficit that plagued his tenure as governor.
Last year, Sen. Ted Lieu considered increasing the fee by 1.35 percent with funds going not to the cities, as they historically (PDF) had been allocated or for law enforcement as they are currently (PDF) allocated, but to transportation. His proposal, which would have created a legislative initiative allowing the voters to decide, according to Brian Leubitz of Calitics, was received with alarm even from fellow Democrats, so he backed down.
Now two groups, Transportation California and the California Alliance for Jobs, will continue the effort through a citizen's ballot initiative, a route often taken for tax and budget measures unable to pass the legislature.
Jim Miller writes that "(t)he road repairs act calls for phasing in a road repairs fee of 1 percent of a vehicle's market value over four years, with the fee taking full effect by Jan. 1, 2018."
According to papers (PDF) filed with the Attorney General's Office on Nov. 18, "(t)he California Road Repairs Act would provide essential funding for critical road repairs, maintenance, and expansion across the state, including: maintaining and rehabilitating local streets and roads; repairing and replacing aging bridges; maintaining and expanding state freeways and highways to reduce traffic congestion; and investing in local mass transit and rail."
Miller writes that "Monday's filing seeks a title and summary. Once cleared for signature gathering, proponents would have up to 150 days to collect 807,615 valid voter signatures to qualify for the November 2014 ballot."
FULL STORY: California transportation leaders seek car tax hike for road repairs

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions