30 years ago, voters in North Texas approved a sales tax to fund the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) system based on promises of reducing congestion, spurring development and sustainable funding. Has the system met its goals? Depends who you ask.
"Automobile-loving North Texans took a radical step 30 years ago. That’s when voters in more than a dozen cities approved a 1 percent sales tax to fund Dallas Area Rapid Transit, now America’s largest light rail system," writes Tom Benning. "Tuesday’s anniversary of that hotly contested election is more than just a date on the calendar. The public transportation proposal pitched to voters in 1983 extended out almost three decades exactly: Service plans went to 2010, while the financial strategy stretched into 2013."
"The question, then, is simple: Has DART kept its early promises to those who voted to try something beyond a deeply rooted embrace of cars and seemingly endless highways?"
Take the congestion argument for example. Though 40,000 people ride the rail line every day, presumably taking many cars off the road, "Dallas-Fort Worth is still the 13th-most-congested urban area in America, according to the Texas A&M Transportation Institute."
“Reducing congestion was probably the worst argument they could’ve made,” said Robert Bruegmann, an expert on urban sprawl at the University of Illinois at Chicago. “It’s an impossible thing to fulfill.”
FULL STORY: At 30, DART still faces growing pains
Dallas Nixes Subway Plan
A proposed subway line was removed from DART’s 20-year plan, with the agency citing low ridership projections and local opposition.
Dallas Adopts an Urban-Centric Vision for its Transit Future
The Dallas City Council picked a side with regard to the D2 line (it prefers a subway to above ground light rail) and the proposed Cotton Belt line (it can wait).
Texas State Bills to Defund Dallas Transit Die
DART would have seen a 30% service cut, $230M annual losses had the bills survived.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).
The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.
The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.
The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.
DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)