Developers in Seattle have been building ultra-compact apartments to provide alternatives to high housing prices. But these "aPodments," which take advantage of loopholes in codes, could bring negative consequences with the large increase in density.
In the Emerald City, dozens of microhousing units are being built on what were once single-family lots. This increasingly common kind of housing "offers a way to reconcile rising urban housing prices with a financially struggling generation's preference for city living," says Claire Thompson, and "is now prompting passionate debate over the best approach to urban landfill." Such developments are a creative way of building affordable housing, but face opposition from "wealthy homeowners who don't want younger, poorer folks flooding their neighborhood, competing for parking spaces, blocking their views, destroying local character, and depreciating neighboring property values."
Another problem, says critics, "is not the idea of density itself or the types of new neighbors it could bring, but the backhanded way Seattle developers have gone about capitalizing on the trend." San Francisco has updated its city code to allow small units and New York is piloting "micro-apartment" projects, but Seattle is allowing developers to count multiple microapartments as one large unit and bypass standard design and environmental reviews. "If aPodments start showing up on every block," said Carl Winter, a representative of neighborhood group Reasonable Density Seattle, "that's an incredible increase in density, and they're never going to study what that density would do."
The Capitol Hill Community Council submitted a resolution to the Seattle City Council asking for a moratorium on new microapartments until the design-review loophole is closed, says Thompson, but it doesn't sound like the city is seriously considering it. "We're observing them and intend to do a little more study," said Mike Podowski, land use policy manager for the city's Department of Planning and Development.
FULL STORY: Peace in a pod: How tiny apartments could reshape the big city

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)