The Case For Rail Transit
A Seattle Times columnist refutes the notion that rail transit is inherently flawed and cannot be cost-effective.
Rail can support wise land use if land-use policy supports rail... Many regions including Seattle face big decisions on investments in transportation. The arguments in the rail debate reveal many complexities and tradeoffs. Yet, as rival claims are traded by advocates, the debate often fails to fully present the issues and charges are made without back-up data or analysis. We need to raise the bar on the quality of information in this crucial arena.
Thanks to Transport Policy Listserv
Full Story:
Published on Friday, December 21, 2001 in
Topics
- A Good Read for Planners and Peers: Why Old Places Matter
- No, Traffic Congestion Does Not Really Cost Every American $1,348 Annually
- Another Approach to Affordable Housing
- California's Commitment to Density Depends on Commitment to Common Destiny
- Amazon Calls the Whole New York Thing Off
- Gov. Gavin Newsom to Dramatically Downsize High-Speed Rail Project
- More Fallout From Downsizing California High-Speed Rail
- Plans for an 'Urban Town' in the Silicon Valley
- Friday Funny: Pity the Fool Who Doesn't Yield to a Law-Abiding Pedestrian
- Research Casts Doubt on the Economic Development Clout of Streetcar Investments
- What President Trump's Border Wall Can't Stop
- Reaching the People: Taking an Innovative Approach to Public Engagement
- Taking the Carbon Emissions Out of Buildings
- Gentrification in Post-Katrina New Orleans
- Explained: The Common Look of the Contemporary Mid-Rise Apartment Building
- Statewide Rent Control Moving Through the Oregon Legislature
- Gender, Climate Change, and Transit Decision Makers
- Two Cities That Reduced Driving Over a Decade
- Sale of Illinois Tollway Considered to Pay Pension Debt
- Ontario's Plan for Taking Over Toronto's Subway Revealed
