With Governor Brown and federal leaders pressuring state legislators to approve construction of the key first step in the $68-billion bullet train plan, a new survey from USC and the L.A. Times shows that California voters are backing away.
Based on the findings of a new survey conducted by the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences and the Los Angeles Times, the plan to build a high-speed rail network connecting Northern and Southern California is losing support amongst the state's voters, reports Ralph Vartabedian. A majority of voters now say they would vote against the original 2008 bond measure that provides a portion of the funding for the project.
The bullet train, which is expected to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco by 2028, is a source of conflict between government officials and an increasingly skeptical public. "You have a situation where general financial pressure and cynicism toward the government has narrowed the support," said Drew Lieberman of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, a Democratic polling firm that conducted the survey jointly with American Viewpoint, a Republican-affiliated firm.
Vartabedian reports that Governor Jerry Brown and other supporters of the train believe that, "the project requires a long-term optimistic view of California's future."
"Some lawmakers agree on the need for the rail service but are concerned that the existing plan is flawed and could set the state up for a big disappointment, if not financial disaster. The decline in public enthusiasm for the proposal appears to reflect more than a short-term fluctuation in sentiment, which might be expected and even discounted by officials trying to execute a decades-long project deemed crucial to the state's economic future."
In addition, California's increasing deficit is making some voters think more carefully about where taxpayer dollars should best be spent. "It costs too much and we need the money in other places," said poll respondent Robert Coplin,"We should fix the roads, fix the levees and reduce the deficit. The rail makes no sense at all."
Thanks to Akemi Leung
FULL STORY: Voters have turned against California bullet train, poll shows

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions