Why Ugly Buildings Matter
Llewellyn Hinkes-Jones makes a strong argument for why ugly buildings deserve some love.
As the Brutalist buildings conceived and built during the 1960s and 70s reach middle age, it is time to consider whether they deserve the protections of their more elegant forefathers.
According to the author, "These behemoth structures of Béton brut, most built in the 1960s and ‘70s, are slowly crumbling from wear and disrepair, ignored by communities that no longer want the burden of upkeep of a giant, lifeless rock. But even horrendously ugly and soulless abominations are part of our architectural heritage and need to be preserved for future generations."
Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 in
Topics
- A Good Read for Planners and Peers: Why Old Places Matter
- More Evidence That New Housing Lowers Rents (Maybe)
- Another Approach to Affordable Housing
- California's Commitment to Density Depends on Commitment to Common Destiny
- More Fallout From Downsizing California High-Speed Rail
- Amazon Calls the Whole New York Thing Off
- Plans for an 'Urban Town' in the Silicon Valley
- Friday Funny: Pity the Fool Who Doesn't Yield to a Law-Abiding Pedestrian
- Two Cities That Reduced Driving Over a Decade
- How to Treat Nature Deficit Disorder in L.A. Without Getting on a Freeway
- Housing Discrimination Still a Vast Problem, Survey Finds
- Philadelphia Sees Record Housing Production
- Obama Presidential Center Dealt Legal Setback
- Keeping the Dream Alive of a Downtown Freeway Cap in Atlanta
- Momentum Builds for Public Housing in California
- Connecticut Transportation Funding Debate: Toll Trucks or Toll All Vehicles?
- Lyft Goes Greener With EVs
- Storefront Service Centers Put Transit Agencies on Solid Footing
- Oregon to Consider New Densities for Transit Adjacent Neighborhoods
- Steady Loss of San Francisco Bay Area Affordable Housing
