Why Ugly Buildings Matter
Llewellyn Hinkes-Jones makes a strong argument for why ugly buildings deserve some love.
As the Brutalist buildings conceived and built during the 1960s and 70s reach middle age, it is time to consider whether they deserve the protections of their more elegant forefathers.
According to the author, "These behemoth structures of Béton brut, most built in the 1960s and ‘70s, are slowly crumbling from wear and disrepair, ignored by communities that no longer want the burden of upkeep of a giant, lifeless rock. But even horrendously ugly and soulless abominations are part of our architectural heritage and need to be preserved for future generations."
Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 in
Topics
- City to Bicyclists: Berkeley Not in Idaho
- $14 Billion Deal for Texas High-Speed Rail Construction
- France's Transit Ridership Booms as the USA's Busts
- Envisioning the 'Soft City'
- First-Time Home Buyers Look Different Than They Once Did
- The Great Flood of 2019, Visualized
- The High Cost of Cool Air
- Frequencies Restored on L.A.'s Expo Line After Rider Backlash
- 2021 Opening Expected for San Francisco's Central Subway
- Digital Transportation: The Future of Urban Mobility
- Las Vegas Faces a Challenging and Uncertain Environmental Future
- Work Underway to Update Detroit's Zoning Code
- The Diversity of Biking in Art and Culture
- Converting a Carpool Lane to a High Occupancy Toll Lane No Easy Task
- Bus Transit Service Increased in Seattle (Again)
- As Community's Colorado's Front Range Grows, Road Planning Follows
- Ride-Hailing Tax to Fund Affordable Housing on the Table in Seattle
- California's Ability to Set Auto Emissions Standards to Be Revoked
- Toronto Wants to Plan Through a Gender Equity Lens
- Stop Giving Away Valuable Public Assets! A Fiduciary Obligation for Road and Parking Pricing
