Why Ugly Buildings Matter
Llewellyn Hinkes-Jones makes a strong argument for why ugly buildings deserve some love.
As the Brutalist buildings conceived and built during the 1960s and 70s reach middle age, it is time to consider whether they deserve the protections of their more elegant forefathers.
According to the author, "These behemoth structures of Béton brut, most built in the 1960s and ‘70s, are slowly crumbling from wear and disrepair, ignored by communities that no longer want the burden of upkeep of a giant, lifeless rock. But even horrendously ugly and soulless abominations are part of our architectural heritage and need to be preserved for future generations."
Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 in
Topics
- CityLab Sold to Bloomberg
- Updated: Journal Article Calls for the End of Single-Family Zoning
- Comic Illustrates the Capitalist Co-option of Jane Jacobs's Teachings
- Sidewalk Labs Debuts New Generative Design Tool
- Development Backlash Follows Population and Job Growth in Western States
- Supreme Court Could Decide on Homeless Public Sleeping
- California's Use of the Colorado River Projected to Hit a Record Low
- Songs About Places 2019
- San Diego Could Eliminate Height Limits Near Transit
- The N.Y.C. Free Parking Giveaway Needs to Stop
- California Climate Program Offers Up to $9,500 Toward Purchase of Used EVs
- Op-Ed: What Can Be Done About Toronto's Drabness?
- Watch a New Bus-Only Lane in Action
- More Research Needed to Reduce Transit Construction Costs
- Land Transformation Along Urban Corridors in India
- Public Opinion Souring on Housing in California
- Cedar Rapids Unveils Sustainability Plan
- Equity in Public Spaces
- Duluth to Provide Free Land for Creative Housing Proposals
- Research Quantifies the High Price of the Massachusetts Car Economy
