New Football Stadium in Los Angeles Faces Opposition
Many oppose his idea because, according to Joel Kotkin, "commitments to mega-projects tend to further drive urban areas into debt, largely by issuing more bonds that taxpayers are obligated to pay back... To get the stadium deal, he continues, Los Angeles, already over-indebted and suffering a poor credit rating, will issue another $275 million."
He also states that "such projects often obscure the real and more complex challenge of nurturing broad-based economic growth... LA's leaders should therefore focus on the systematic causes for the region's ailing economy. One source of the problem lies in tough environmental rules that, although lifted on behalf of football, clamp on growth of virtually every other industry, including the city's port and manufacturing sector."
Topics
- Tiny Home Village to Close Amid Controversy in Seattle
- A New, Old Transit Station in Philadelphia
- Vancouver Launches a New Citywide Planning Process
- An Ambitious Approach to Planning a Small Texas City
- 2,000 Units of Privately Funded Affordable Housing Approved for Queens
- Local Leaders Press Massachusetts for New Sources of Transportation Funding
- Flood Barrier Approved for Manhattan's East Side
- To Reduce Carbon Emissions, Focus on Existing Buildings
- Pittsburgh to Oakland BRT Making Planning Progress
- A Surprising Lack of Geographic Knowledge
- Mobility as a Service Technology Will Not Solve the Country's Transportation Problems
- Key Planning Details of the Proposed $1.9 Billion Rail Bridge Between D.C. and Virginia
- L.A. Crafting Legislation for 'Anti-Displacement Zones'
- Human Waste as a Climate Solution
- Seasoned Developer Opines on California’s Housing Crisis
- No Cars Allowed: Arizona Multi-Family Development Tests the Market for Car-Free Living
- Uber Could Record Rides in the U.S.
- Saying 'No' to Development in Climate Risk Areas
- Recoupling Planning and Landscape Architecture
- It’s Organic! The End of Conjecture and the Science Ahead
