Bicycling in the City is Good for You, Despite Air Pollution
A recent study shows that bicyclists absorb more carbon soot in their lungs than pedestrians or drivers. But new reports argue that the benefits of the exercise far outweigh the downsides.
Conrad deFiebre dissects the argument, explaining that yes, studies show a small increase in mortality for bicyclists in polluted areas:
"But this downside is outweighed nearly 100 to 1 by the health and fitness advantages of cycling. The British Medical Journal study found that one more bicyclist might die over seven or eight years from air pollution compared with drivers, while more than 12 lives would be saved each year by the health benefits of cycling."
DeFiebre also takes on Wendell Cox, who argues that the increase in pollution is an argument against densification.
Published on Sunday, October 9, 2011 in
- Every Parking Lot, Visualized
- First Mile-Last Mile, Intermodalism, and Making Public Transit More Attractive
- To Learn About a City, Visit Its Neighborhoods
- A Boring Lesson for Planners
- An Interactive Map of the World's Climate in 2100
- Like City, Like Stadium
- Could Baby Boomers Make Room for Millennials?
- Study: 'Eyes on the Street' Have Real Value for Neighborhood Safety
- Are Form-Based Design Standards Easier Than Form-Based Codes?
- Big Transit Plans Approved for Richmond, Virginia
- Manhattan's Midtown East Rezoning Wins Critical Approval
- Trump Tells Residents to Leave Upstate New York
- New Pedestrian Crossing Between California and Mexico Opening Next Week
- Berkeley Wants to Fund a Tent City for the Homeless
- California's Business-Friendly, Bipartisan Approach to Climate Change
- Portland's 'Adaptive Biketown' Sets a New Standard for Access to Mobility
- Big Investment Firms Are Dominating the Landlord Business
- Long-Awaited Hartford to New Haven Commuter Rail Expected in 2018
- Art in the Face of Gentrification
- 10 Facts That Explain Crosswalks
