Bicycling in the City is Good for You, Despite Air Pollution
A recent study shows that bicyclists absorb more carbon soot in their lungs than pedestrians or drivers. But new reports argue that the benefits of the exercise far outweigh the downsides.
Conrad deFiebre dissects the argument, explaining that yes, studies show a small increase in mortality for bicyclists in polluted areas:
"But this downside is outweighed nearly 100 to 1 by the health and fitness advantages of cycling. The British Medical Journal study found that one more bicyclist might die over seven or eight years from air pollution compared with drivers, while more than 12 lives would be saved each year by the health benefits of cycling."
DeFiebre also takes on Wendell Cox, who argues that the increase in pollution is an argument against densification.
Published on Sunday, October 9, 2011 in
- Sea-Level Rise Report: Bad News for South Florida
- Zero Fare Transit Approved in Kansas City, Missouri
- 2019 Bicycle Friendly States Rankings Released
- Canadian Suburb Sets Sights on 'Mobility Orbit'
- Local Curbed Sites Shut Down in D.C., Seattle, New Orleans, Philadelphia
- How Can Cities Adapt to Rising Temperatures? Change the Weather
- Water Concerns Follow New Development in Montana
- Air Pollution, Visualized
- Updated: Requiring Space for Homeless in New Development
- Pontiac, Comeback City
- Journal Article Calls for the End of Single-Family Zoning
- Report Documents Safety Concerns on Boston's T
- Light Rail Repair Project Falls Short of Promises in Los Angeles
- Use of Private Surveillance Grows With the Help of Cheap AI Tech
- New Oil and Gas Drilling in California May Be Subject to Moratorium
- San Diego Could Eliminate Height Limits Near Transit
- Public Art and Resilience Planning
- Infrastructure Policy Reform, From the Ground Up
- E-ZPass Could Limit the Effectiveness of NYC's Congestion Charge
- Supreme Court Could Decide on Homeless Public Sleeping
