Cars With California Emissions Control Systems Not Needed in Pennsylvania

This op-ed rebuts the calls for Pennsylvania to require that new cars sold across the Commonwealth be equipped with emission controls that comply with California state requirements.

1 minute read

January 17, 2006, 8:00 AM PST

By David Gest


"Existing federal emission limits will eliminate almost all remaining automobile air pollution during the next two decades. Adopting California's requirements would cost Pennsylvanians a bundle, while conferring imperceptible environmental benefits."

"States have a choice when it comes to emission standards for new automobiles: federal or California. Under federal requirements, total air pollution from Pennsylvania's cars will decline about 80 percent over the next 20 years. With California standards, the decline would be 82 percent. The air will be clean either way."

"Here's the trick: To simplify the calculations, let's say Pennsylvania's automobiles currently put 100 tons of pollution into the air each day. Over the next 20 years, federal standards will get rid of 80 tons, or 80 percent, so that 20 tons per day remain. California’s standards would get rid of 82 tons, or 82 percent, leaving 18 tons remaining."

"Eighteen tons is 10 percent less than 20 tons. This is the source of The Patriot-News' claim of the benefits of California’s requirements. But the difference between 20 and 18 tons is only 2 percent of the current baseline of 100 tons, which is the appropriate baseline for measuring future improvements."

Thanks to C. P. Zilliacus

Monday, December 12, 2005 in American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Cover CM Credits, Earn Certificates, Push Your Career Forward

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

June 18, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Rendering of Shirley Chisholm Village four-story housing development with person biking in front.

San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning

SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.

June 8, 2025 - Fast Company

Yellow single-seat Japanese electric vehicle drivign down road.

The Tiny, Adorable $7,000 Car Turning Japan Onto EVs

The single seat Mibot charges from a regular plug as quickly as an iPad, and is about half the price of an average EV.

June 6, 2025 - PC Magazine

SMall backyard cottage ADU in San Diego, California.

San Diego Votes to Rein in “Towering” ADUs

City council voted to limit the number of units in accessory buildings to six — after confronting backyard developments of up to 100 units behind a single family home.

June 18 - NBC San Diego

Large tower under construction with crane with American and Texas flags in downtown Austin, Texas against sunset sky.

Texas Legislature’s Surprising Pro-Housing Swing

Smaller homes on smaller lots, office to apartment conversions, and 40% less say for NIMBYs, vote state lawmakers.

June 18 - The Texas Tribune

Red brick five-story multifamily housing building in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Even Edmonton Wants Single Staircase Buildings

Canada's second most affordable major city joins those angling to nix the requirement for two staircases in multi-family buildings.

June 18 - Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)