Ross Levin explains what accounts for differences in protection of property rights across different societies.
"The security of property rights, however, is not a natural occurrence; rather, it is anoutcome of policy choices and social institutions. Any government strong enough to define andenforce property rights is also strong enough to abrogate those rights (North and Weingast,1989). Thus, protection of property rights requires finding a balance between: 1) an activegovernment that enforces property rights, facilitates private contracting, and applies the lawfairly to all, and 2) a government sufficiently constrained that it cannot engage in coercion andexpropriation. This paper describes two views of what leads a society to greater or lesser protection ofproperty rights. The law view stresses that differences in legal traditions formed centuries ago inEurope and spread via conquest, colonization and imitation around the world continue to accountfor cross-country differences in property rights. The endowment view argues that differences innatural resources, climate, the indigenous population, and the disease environment affected theconstruction of institutions and these self-sustaining institutions continue to shape property rightstoday. These views are not mutually exclusive, nor do they exhaust the possible explanations ofcross-country differences in property rights."
Levin sums up his investigation this way:
"Property rights affect individual liberty and national prosperity. While scholars have hypothesized about the sources of variation in property rights for over 2500 years, researchers have begun to test theories empirically only recently. Researchers have made enormous strides in empirically assessing different theories of the determinants of property rights, but these investigations are in their nascent stages. The law and endowment views offer compelling theories of how legal heritage and natural selection endowments shape property rights today. I see no reason to neglect either explanation but believe that considerably more work is needed in each."
[Editor's note: The link below is to a 150KB PDF document.]
Thanks to Peter Gordon's Blog
Read the full story: Law, Endowments and Property Rights
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Move over, LA: St. Louis gears up for Olympics, invests millions in downtown redevelopment
The Missouri city will host the 2028 Olympic soccer group stage and knockout matches.
‘No clear next steps’ for Chicago's permanent festival grounds
Eleventh Ward Ald. Nicole Lee has suggested Soldier Field as a possible location for the permanent event space.
California, Hawaii, Rhode Island approve housing propositions
Hawaii and Rhode Island each approved their sole proposition, while California approved two of its three.
Officials claim feds 'rushed' Amtrak environmental review
Amtrak plans to move their Chicago maintenance facility from an industrial area to a residential one.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority