Most likely, no one in particular—but policy changes can alleviate the housing shortage and prevent displacement.
As more neighborhoods and cities experience the impact of redevelopment, often termed gentrification, people seek individual culprits to pin the blame on. Whether it is the owners of the hip new coffeeshop, the developer building that new building, or the young professionals renting or buying homes in previously undesirable neighborhoods, the human need for attribution leads us to discount broader, institutional forces, according to Alan Ehrenhalt’s recent piece in Governing.
While “yuppies” or “hipsters,” whatever the term du jour is, are an easy target—“Most seriously, they raise rents and property taxes and inevitably force some poorer inhabitants to look elsewhere for lodging”—Ehrenhalt argues that “To hold them responsible for the discomforts of gentrification is essentially to blame the customer.”
Gentrification’s suppliers, Ehrenhalt writes, are indeed real estate companies and developers. “Yet for developers and landlords to be the true villains of gentrification, it would be necessary to determine that they are worse stewards than the small property owners who dominated poor neighborhoods in pre-gentrification days. There is no real evidence that this is the case.”
The real problem, according to Ehrenhalt, is the shortage of affordable housing supply and construction. “It’s the fault of an entrenched and complex system that has existed for decades and doesn’t have a perpetrator to put the finger on.”
To Ehrenhalt, “The only way to make a serious dent in the shortage of moderately priced housing is to encourage more of it without demonizing the people living comfortably under the current rules.”
While eliminating single-family zoning and permitting light density increases is one avenue for creating more housing, these policies probably won’t make a significant dent in the million of housing units needed to alleviate the current shortage. Ehrenhalt concludes, “To me, the only practical zoning solution is to stick to commercial corridors, and to build big there — tall apartment buildings, not duplexes or fourplexes” near transit lines that can accommodate families.
FULL STORY: Gentrification and the Search for Villains
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
5 New England states march closer to 800 megawatt wind energy project
Securing federal approval for the project may be complicated under the Trump administration, which has historically been hostile towards domestic wind power.
Baltimore to break ground on $50 million Transit Priority Project
The project will bring faster bus trips, safer streets and better bike connections to Baltimore.
Airbnb launches $250 million 'last-dollar financing' housing accelerator, makes first investment in Austin
The company will put $6.4 million towards affordable housing development in Texas’ capital.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association