Revising federal crash test standards and updating test dummies to mimic a wider variety of bodies could save thousands of lives each year.

A coalition titled Vehicle Equity Rules in Transportation (Verity Now) is calling on federal regulators to make crash testing more inclusive through the use of "biofidelic" crash test dummies. According to reporting by Kea Wilson, the coalition claims that adopting updated test dummy standards and reviewing them regularly could save up to 1,342 lives each year.
Because test dummies reflect the male body, "[s[tudies show that when they’re inside of a car at the time of a crash, women and people who were assigned female at birth are 17 percent more likely to die and 73 percent more likely to be seriously injured than a driver or passenger who was assigned male at birth who’s struck in the same conditions."
Under the recently passed Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the regulators who supervise the New Car Assessment Program will, for the first time, be required to test and provide information to prospective car-buyers on how likely their vehicle is to kill or injure a pedestrian, a critical standard that other nations adopted way back in 2008.
However, the new requirements won't ban cars that fail from being sold, writes Wilson. While other factors such as driving behavior and vehicle choice are also at play, "few doubt that sexist vehicle testing standards are a major contributor to the problem, or that crash testing standards desperately need to be fixed."
Susan Molinari, a former member of Congress from New York and Verity Now co-chair, says women's physiology differs in ways that make a big impact on how crashes affect their bodies, and crash testing should "compensate for those differences." If the NHTSA does not act on updating the standards, her group is prepared to lobby for legislation that would mandate improved vehicle safety standards.
FULL STORY: Advocates Urge Federal Update of Gender-Biased Crash Test Standards

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.

‘Quality Work, Fast’: NC Gears up for Homebuilding After Helene, Trying to Avoid Past Pitfalls
The state will field bids to demolish, repair and rebuild homes in the mountains. After struggles in eastern NC, officials aim to chart a different course.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions