California's redevelopment program was killed during the budget fallout of the Great Recession. Now more state politicians see how tax increment devoted to development investments could be one tool int he state's affordable housing crisis.
The Los Angeles Times Editorial Board suggests that the time has come for the state of California to revamp the idea of redevelopment agencies—an idea defunct since former Governor Jerry Brown axed the investment program in the height of the budget austerity of the Great Recession.
The editorial suggests that some of the state's affordable housing shortage could be alleviated by the reintroduction of redevelopment. Instead of the flawed system in place prior to the recession, the editorial calls for a Redevelopment 2.0.
Cities need an ongoing source of money for affordable housing. This is especially important as [Governor Gavin] Newsom and state lawmakers are pushing cities to zone for more homes for Californians at all income levels. Although the need for more market-rate housing can be addressed by lowering regulatory and political barriers, the critical shortage of affordable units is both a political and a financial problem. Simply put, developers can’t produce the amount of affordable housing needed without public subsidies.
Governor Gavin Newsom, in office since the beginning of the year, has spoken in favor of Redevelopment 2.0 before, but he hasn't been consistent on the issue—even as a bill to pursue a new redevelopment program, Assembly Bill 11, died in the Legislature in May. Another attempt at crafting legislation to revive redevelopment is also contained in Senate Bill 5, authored by State Senator Jim Beall (D-San Jose).
The editorial concludes with cautious support for the idea of redevelopment: "The idea behind redevelopment — to give local governments the ability to launch community revitalization projects that the private sector wouldn’t do alone — is still worthwhile. And the needs are at least as great."
FULL STORY: Editorial: Jerry Brown killed redevelopment in California. Gavin Newsom should bring it back to life
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
5 New England states march closer to 800 megawatt wind energy project
Securing federal approval for the project may be complicated under the Trump administration, which has historically been hostile towards domestic wind power.
Baltimore to break ground on $50 million Transit Priority Project
The project will bring faster bus trips, safer streets and better bike connections to Baltimore.
Airbnb launches $250 million 'last-dollar financing' housing accelerator, makes first investment in Austin
The company will put $6.4 million towards affordable housing development in Texas’ capital.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association