Hard costs like labor and materials combined with ‘soft’ costs such as permitting make building in the San Francisco Bay Area almost three times as costly as in Texas cities.

A new report from the RAND Corporation highlights the differences in the cost of building housing in the Bay Area as compared to Texas.
According to an article by Christian Leonard in the San Francisco Chronicle, just two Texas metropolitan areas, Dallas and Houston, approved more new housing permits in 2024 than the entire state of California, and this largely comes down to the difference in cost. California’s production cost per rentable square foot is 2.3 times higher than Texas’. In the Bay Area, construction costs are three times those in Texas.
A combination of factors, including stricter zoning rules, higher permitting fees, higher labor wages, and earthquake and energy efficiency requirements, all contribute to California’s higher costs. “It takes an average of nearly two years longer to finish a multifamily project in California than it does in Texas, the report found, adding to borrowing and rental costs.”
Among the report’s recommendations to reduce costs in California: requiring cities to approve or deny permits within 30 days to eliminate costly delays; promoting large-scale upzoning and reducing development fees for infrastructure; and adjusting requirements for affordable housing to make them less onerous. However, some experts warn that some costs are necessary and help address issues such as homelessness and climate change that California lawmakers tend to prioritize.
FULL STORY: Here’s how much it costs to build an apartment in the Bay vs Texas

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)