Local officials in Gilbert, Arizona, say a new town ordinance that will fine homeowners for unsightly debris in their backyards is about fighting blight; critics say it’s a violation of their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure.
Gilbert, Arizona—home of the 2015 sign code case heard round the planning world, Reed v. Town of Gilbert—is in the news again for a new town ordinance the city says is aimed at battling blight. According to local news outlet 12 News, the Gilbert Town Council recently voted 5-1 “to adopt the Community Preservation Ordinance that would fine homeowners up to $500 for having dead grass, piled up debris, and cars that don't work in their yards.” While that might not seem all that unusual, what sets this ordinance apart is it applies to homeowners’ backyards (previously the town could only address blight if it posed life and safety issues and only in front and side yards, according to an article from Gilbert US News) and heavily relies on neighbors reporting on neighbors.
Golightly spoke to Gilbert resident Chris Lindahl who is concerned the ordinance “gives the town too much power and control over people's yards. He also didn't like the idea that neighbors who lives in two story houses could look into his backyard and report him to Code Compliance if they didn't like what they saw.” He sees it as a potential violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
Town planning manager Eva Cutro told 12 News that the ordinance is aimed at preserving the community from blight and said the ordinance has written protections so that state and constitutional rights will not be violated. “She also said they will report to the council every three months to make sure the system is not being abused and will make changes to the ordinance if necessary. Cutro added that they do not plan on giving citations out right away and plan on working with homeowners first to get the problem situated.”
The lone dissenter town council, Councilman Jim Torgeson, told Gilbert US News, he understands the need for such an ordinance but is concerned with its dependence on use of discretion by code compliance officers, but might that lead to inconsistent enforcement of the ordinance?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
5 New England states march closer to 800 megawatt wind energy project
Securing federal approval for the project may be complicated under the Trump administration, which has historically been hostile towards domestic wind power.
Baltimore to break ground on $50 million Transit Priority Project
The project will bring faster bus trips, safer streets and better bike connections to Baltimore.
Airbnb launches $250 million 'last-dollar financing' housing accelerator, makes first investment in Austin
The company will put $6.4 million towards affordable housing development in Texas’ capital.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association