A new report warns that microtransit is nothing more than a taxpayer funded Uber with potentially dangerous consequences for existing traditional transit services.
Microtransit pilots and programs are popping up across the country. But, Streetsblog’s Kea Wilson reports, some transportation experts are sounding the alarm that the promise of complementing or replacing traditional fixed-route vehicles with sedans, vans, or shuttles that offer door-to-door service is just “app-taxis by another name.” It’s too good to be true, according to a new report from the Amalgamated Transit Union, which shows that microtransit is already costing local transportation agencies two to three times more per passenger than their worst-performing bus routes on average.
The report outlines additional cracks in microtransit’s veneer:
- Few passengers are actually going anywhere near each other at the same time, meaning the majority of rides are single-person.
- As popularity rises, as it’s bound to for “dirt-cheap, mostly private chauffeur service,” agencies are forced to raise fares or deny requests for rides above their capacity.
- Data from several cities show microtransit is more likely to serve able, white-bodied affluent residents than BIPOC, disabled, and low-income passengers.
- Microtransit operations are often contracted out to private companies, who often don’t provide their part-time gig-worker drivers with basic benefits or guaranteed working hours and in some cases are requested to lease their vehicles from the company and pay for fuel out of their own pockets.
“Despite this, some agencies still choose to do whatever it takes to keep microtransit going — including cannibalizing funds from fixed route transit, accelerating a death spiral that's already been spinning faster since the pandemic,” Wilson writes.
Does that mean cities should avoid microtransit at all costs? The report author says not necessarily, but that it’s best for transit agencies to focus investments on their core service and reserve in-house micro-transit service in the limited situations that are worth a steep subsidy to decrease fares — such as “providing accessible paratransit vans to people with disabilities, piloting service in new neighborhoods that might someday get a dedicated route, and providing those elusive last-mile connections” — while paying drivers a living wage and benefits.
FULL STORY: Microtranist Is Taxpayer Funded Uber, Advocates Warn — And It’s a Threat to Real Transit
2024: The Year in Zoning
Cities and states are leaning on zoning reform to help stem the housing crisis and create more affordable, livable neighborhoods.
NACTO Releases Updated Urban Bikeway Guide
The third edition of the nationally recognized road design guide includes detailed design advice for roads that prioritize safety and accessibility for all users.
Research Affirms Safety of ‘Idaho Stop’
Allowing cyclists to treat stop signs as yield signs does not negatively impact safety and can help people on bikes more effectively navigate roadways.
Chicago Transit Leaders Call for $1.5B Funding Package
Public transit across the Chicagoland region could suffer massive cuts without additional funding.
After the Fires: Challenges and Efforts to Heal LA’s Parks and Trails
The recent LA wildfires have devastated parks and trails, with recovery efforts requiring extended closures, collaborative restoration plans, and community support to address extensive damage and long-term risks like landslides.
DC Launches New Round of E-Bike Rebates
District residents can apply for a subsidy of up to $1,500 to purchase e-bikes.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Placer County
Skagit Transit
Berkeley County
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland