Advocates for tribal communities argue that the bipartisan infrastructure bill does not direct enough money to tribal transportation needs, but USDOT and local leaders can ensure more equitable distribution of funds to projects on tribal lands.
A blog post from Tala Parker, a summer fellow at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), examines the funding available for tribal transportation projects in last year’s infrastructure law, the potential for improvements, and the shortfalls of the bill in addressing the high rates of traffic violence on tribal lands.
“While the overall budget doubled, funding for Tribal transportation only increased by about 50 percent (from $2.4 billion in the FAST Act to $3.8 billion in the infrastructure law).” Parker explains that this increase is clearly inequitable, in part because Native people die at disproportionately high rates on roadways, and because the funding is not even proportionate to the Native population.
It is still possible to close the gap between the infrastructure law’s inadequate Tribal funding allocation and an equitable spending strategy, if the federal government and states succeed in allocating an additional $9-10 billion to address needs identified by Indigenous communities.
Parker outlines the oversight and long-term capacity building necessary to successfully implement this approach. Because the federal government did not direct enough funds to tribal roads and transportation in the bill, Parker writes, it’s up to state governments, tribal leaders, and the Department of Transportation to ensure an equitable distribution of resources that will improve safety and transportation options in tribal communities.
FULL STORY: Infrastructure law short on tribal transportation spending
Coming Soon to Ohio: The Largest Agrivoltaic Farm in the US
The ambitious 6,000-acre project will combine an 800-watt solar farm with crop and livestock production.
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause
A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.
Divvy Introduces E-Bike Charging Docks
New, circular docks let e-bikes charge at stations, eliminating the need for frequent battery swaps.
How Freeway Projects Impact Climate Resilience
In addition to displacement and public health impacts, highway expansions can also make communities less resilient to flooding and other climate-related disasters.
California Grid Runs on 100% Renewable Energy for Over 9 Hours
The state’s energy grid was entirely powered by clean energy for some portion of the day on 37 out of the last 45 days.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.