The California Supreme Court ruled against the university in a battle over a proposed enrollment cap, forcing the school to reject thousands of potential new students.
After a legal battle over a proposed hike in enrollment, the University of California, Berkeley will be forced to cut enrollment by roughly 3,000 students in the coming fall. Nanette Asimov and Bob Egelko report on the saga, which began when a neighborhood group sued on the grounds that the university did not conduct the appropriate Environmental Impact Review (EIR) for its proposed expansion.
In August, Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman ordered the campus to cap enrollment at 42,237 — the fall 2020 number — and to halt construction of its Upper Hearst project at 2698 Hearst Ave.: two buildings intended to house professors and add classrooms for the Goldman School of Public Policy. Neighbors had argued that the university failed to properly plan for the increased noise, traffic and other quality-of-life problems the project would bring.
Save Berkeley's Neighborhoods, the group that brought the lawsuit, says it does not want to stop the university's projects altogether, but rather to ensure the university conducts an adequate analysis of potential impacts. "On a 4-2 vote, in a one-sentence order without further comment, the court refused to lift the enrollment freeze ordered by an Alameda County judge and denied review of an appellate ruling requiring the university to conduct further environmental review of an off-campus construction project while it limits incoming enrollment."
The article details the lawsuit and subsequent appeals, which culminated on March 3 with the California Supreme Court decision.
A proposed state bill making its way through the California legislature would exempt public universities from CEQA requirements, which could prevent future battles similar to this one.
Read the full story: UC Berkeley must withhold thousands of acceptance letters after state Supreme Court ruling
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority