Last year's Miami Beach condo collapse could portend more tragedy to come if developers don't address the risks of aging buildings and climate change.

In a deeply reported piece in The New York Times, Matthew Shaer examines the risks faced by Miami Beach's many high-rise condo buildings, a risk made painfully clear by the June 2021 collapse of a Surfside high-rise. With 98 fatalities, the collapse was "one of the deadliest engineering failures in the history of the United States."
According to James McGuinness, chief building official for Surfside, "This terrible tragedy, which is a national tragedy, is going to change the building codes as they relate to certification and all existing buildings." McGuinness warned that the soil that buildings are built on is an important factor, particularly in coastal zones where existing land is often shored up with infill.
But meaningful reform, of the kind McGuinness imagined, has long been notoriously hard to enact. Florida has roughly 1.5 million residential condo units — among the most of any state — and a highly lucrative condo and co-op industry with many powerful players, from management companies and developers to firms specializing in condo law. Historically, these groups, and the lobbyists who represent them, have successfully pushed back against any policy they view as constrictive or unduly expensive.
Built at the turn of the 20th century on a foundation of former mangrove swamps, Miami Beach is home to hundreds of aging buildings that face similar risks to Champlain Towers. Experts say the state must urgently strengthen regulations that hold developers accountable for the safety of their projects, regulations described in more detail in the source article. Many residents, Shaer writes, find themselves in a bind. "Median house prices are soaring; the real estate market is sloshing with investor cash. But the dangers of staying put are potentially even greater."
FULL STORY: The Towers and the Ticking Clock

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)