Opinion: When Transit-Oriented Suburban Mega-Projects Go Too Far

The architecture critic for the Globe and Mail finds fault with two massive development proposals in the Toronto suburbs.

2 minute read

February 2, 2022, 10:00 AM PST

By James Brasuell @CasualBrasuell


Row after row after row of single-family residences, with the high rises of the city of Toronto looming far in the background.

liran finzi sokolovski / Shutterstock

Alex Bozikovic, architecture critic for the Globe and Mail, writes about what he calls "a bit of Hong Kong in the 905"—the conceptual renderings for two new 'transit-oriented communities' in the Toronto suburbs of Richmond Hill and Markham.

"Drawings show forests of shimmering, skinny towers dropped into a flat suburban landscape," according to Bozikovic (see the renderings at the source article), and some local residents see a 'wasteland.'

While acknowledging the decidedly NIMBYesque flavor of the local opposition, Bozikovic writes "But in this rare instance, they’re right."

Bozikovic offers that frank assessment while also acknowledging the sound logic behind the proposal: "Put people near transit, and they will take transit rather than drive. And when you put enough people together, they can support retail and other amenities within walking distance."

So what goes wrong with the current proposal? According to Bozikovic the plan stretches that logic "to absurdity."

The High-Tech site would include 33 towers with 21,000 homes, plus retail and enough offices for about 7,000 jobs. One single block there would include three towers of 60 storeys and three of 80 storeys. The Bridge plan is comparable. Parks are thin. There are no schools. This would be one of the densest clusters of development in the entire region.

Bozikovic wrote an article in February 2020 that repeats similarities on the theme of how challenging it can be to build an urban suburb from scratch—and there are examples in the Toronto region, in Bozikovic's opinion, of failed attempts.

Tuesday, February 1, 2022 in The Globe and Mail

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Use Code 25for25 at checkout for 25% off an annual plan!

Redlining map of Oakland and Berkeley.

Rethinking Redlining

For decades we have blamed 100-year-old maps for the patterns of spatial racial inequity that persist in American cities today. An esteemed researcher says: we’ve got it all wrong.

May 15, 2025 - Alan Mallach

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

May 21, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Rendering of California High-Speed Rail station with bullet train.

California High-Speed Rail's Plan to Right Itself

The railroad's new CEO thinks he can get the project back on track. The stars will need to align this summer.

May 19, 2025 - Benjamin Schneider

Red SF Muni ticketing machine.

San Francisco Muni Raises Fares a Second Time

A 10–cent fare hike for adults is part of the agency’s plan to chip away at a growing budget deficit.

May 21 - San Francisco Examiner

Electric car charging station with several Chevy Bolts charging in parking lot of store in Bellingham, Washington

Electric Grid Capacity Could Hamstring EV Growth

Industry leaders say the U.S. electric grid is unprepared for the increased demand for power created by electric cars, data centers, and electric homes.

May 21 - GovTech

Top view new development riverside residential and commercial neighborhood with vacant land in Texas, USA.

Texas Bill Supports Adaptive Reuse in Commercial Areas

Senate Bill 840, which was preliminarily approved by the state House, would allow residential construction in areas previously zoned for offices and commercial uses.

May 21 - The Texas Tribune