Rent control is a popular response to the ongoing housing affordability crisis in many parts of the United States, but there is still a chorus of economists and planners who argue that rent control can do more harm than good to housing affordability.

Bill Lindeke writes for the twin cities sidewalks blog to make the case that the Housing Equity Now Saint Paul (HENS) rent control proposal, which would cap rent increases at 3 percent annually, would stop new housing from being built—a "de facto ban on housing," as it's described here.
Earlier this month, Lindeke reported for the MinnPost that St. Paul voters are faced with the prospect of approving the country's most aggressive rent control policy in the November election. To recap the summary of the HENS proposal provided in that article:
The law would cap rent increases for all of the city’s 65,000 rented homes at 3% per year, but includes a complicated list of factors that allow landlords to apply for a variances — things like property taxes, maintenance issues, capital improvements (only if needed to bring a building to code), and a few others. The process for applying for the variances is yet to be determined. The ordinance exempts only subsidized housing from the caps.
In the blog post for twin cities sidewalks, Lindeke explains that the question that keeps coming up since the MinnPost article is as follows: "Why does a 3% rent cap stop new housing from being built?"
Lindeke's answer, which you should click through below to read in full, hinges on
- The difference between landlords and developers: "3% is usually fine for a landlord but a huge limit for someone leasing out a new building."
- Inflation: "If inflation is close to or higher than 3%, you're just plain screwed. Not only can’t you move rents around to fill a building, you're actually forced to lower rents in real dollars."
The 3 percent cap on rent therefore, according to Lindeke, "greatly increases the risk of loans for new housing construction."
FULL STORY: Why the 3% Rent Cap Stops New Housing Construction

The Right to Mobility
As we consider how to decarbonize transportation, preserving mobility, especially for lower- and middle-income people, must be a priority.

Early Sharrow Booster: ‘I Was Wrong’
The lane marking was meant to raise awareness and instill shared respect among drivers and cyclists. But their inefficiency has led supporters to denounce sharrows, pushing instead for more robust bike infrastructure that truly protects riders.

Push and Pull: The Link Between Walkability and Affordability
The increased demand for walkable urban spaces could make them more and more exclusionary if cities don’t pursue policies to limit displacement and boost affordability.

U.S. Transit Agencies Face a Financial Crisis
Transit providers around the country are scrambling to find new sources of revenue to replace lagging ridership and reorienting their systems to a future less dependent on daily commuters.

California Rejects Six-State Colorado River Plan, Proposes Its Own
State officials claim a proposal agreed upon by the other six states using Colorado River water disproportionately impacts California farmers.

Washington Focuses Road Safety Efforts on Individuals, Neglecting Design
Legislative efforts to reduce traffic deaths could move the needle toward Vision Zero, but state leaders failed to commit infrastructure funds to making structural improvements.
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension
York County Government
York County, Human Resources
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Harvard GSD Executive Education
City of Culver City
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
City of Piedmont, CA
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.