The nation's fair housing policies are built on a foundation of assumptions that neglects the community and culture of low-income neighborhoods.

Edward G. Goetz, Anthony Damiano, and Rashad Williams explain the work of a coalition called Equity in Plan to shift the discussion about fair housing in the Twin Cities. According to the article, Equity in Place (EIP) has shifted the discussion about fair housing with a simple question: "Why do we think moving to white neighborhoods will solve our problems?"
The question has its roots in the fair housing battles surrounding disparate impact and affirmatively furthering fair housing, which attempt to overcome a history of discriminatory planning and development policies that concentrated public housing resources in areas of high poverty. EIP makes the case that the fair housing narrative neglects the communal and cultural identity of these neighborhoods.
"EIP first emerged in 2013, in response to the Metropolitan Council’s decennial regional plan, Thrive MSP 2040," according to the article. The regional plan was built on a "a Fair Housing Equity Assessment that, in accordance with HUD’s directives, emphasized the identification of both 'racially concentrated areas of poverty' (RCAPs, later amended by HUD to RECAPs—racially/ethnically concentrated areas of poverty) and 'high opportunity areas,'" according to the article.
EIP organizers created a three-pronged response: regarding narrative, EIP wanted to challenge the dominant storyline that portrays RECAPs as the central problem of regional equity; in policy terms, EIP wanted to challenge the dominant housing strategy that focused on moving people to “opportunity neighborhoods”; and, in political terms, the group demanded a place at the table for low-wealth communities of color when decisions about those communities are being made. Most fundamentally, EIP wanted to redefine regional equity in ways that include “building the economic, cultural, political, human and social capital of the places people of color already call home”
"Between 2013 and 2020, a central element of EIP’s work was investigating the unstated assumptions of this opportunity framework and expressing them in easily understood language," according the article.
A lot more detail on the fruits of that work is included in the source article.
FULL STORY: ‘Opportunity Areas’ Shouldn’t Just Be Places With A Lot of White People

Rethinking Redlining
For decades we have blamed 100-year-old maps for the patterns of spatial racial inequity that persist in American cities today. An esteemed researcher says: we’ve got it all wrong.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

California High-Speed Rail's Plan to Right Itself
The railroad's new CEO thinks he can get the project back on track. The stars will need to align this summer.

Santa Clara County Dedicates Over $28M to Affordable Housing
The county is funding over 600 new affordable housing units via revenue from a 2016 bond measure.

Why a Failed ‘Smart City’ Is Still Relevant
A Google-backed proposal to turn an underused section of Toronto waterfront into a tech hub holds relevant lessons about privacy and data.

When Sears Pioneered Modular Housing
Kit homes sold in catalogs like Sears and Montgomery Ward made homeownership affordable for midcentury Americans.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions