IndyGo transit officials are required to match transit income tax revenue with funding from private sources, but haven't yet met that end of the bargain. A new state law would hold IndyGo accountable to those requirements.

"The Indiana Senate voted Thursday [February 27] to put teeth in a 2014 state law that required IndyGo to raise private dollars to help finance its mass transit operations, including the Red Line—something it has not done to date," reports Lesley Weidenbener.
"IndyGo officials say the legislation—which still requires final votes in the House and Senate—could significantly jeopardize its operations and its ability to build the planned Blue and Purple rapid transit lines," according to Weidenbener.
A 2014 law that, according to Weidenbener, "authorized a 0.25-percentage-point increase in the city’s income tax rate to fund IndyGo operations and new services," is the source of the controversy. That law required IndyGo to provide a 10 percent match of tax revenue with funding from private sources.
"The tax went into effect in October 2017 and is generating about $60 million per year. [State Senator Aaron] Freeman said that means IndyGo would need to raise about $6 million per year to meet the law’s threshold, but the agency has so far not raised any private money," according to Weidenbener. The 2014 law didn't include penalties if the city failed to meet that requirement, so the law proposed by Freeman last week would "require the state to withhold 10% of IndyGo’s local income tax revenue in years that it failed to meet the private funding threshold," according to Weidenbener.
Planetizen documented some of the long process of the city's adoption of the transit income tax, from approval by voters, to implementation delays and eventual approval by the City Council, to initial ridership success and ambitious plans enabled by the new revenue stream.
FULL STORY: Bill could strip IndyGo of millions of dollars, halt future work on Purple, Blue lines

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)