Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
Trump Administration Launches Long-Promised Challenge to Fair Housing Law
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development published a new rule [pdf] regarding the disparate impact standards of the Fair Housing Act, following through on promises that date back to earlier times in the administration.
The news of the proposed rule, published on the Federal Register this Monday, was first reported by Katy O'Donnell for Politico at the end of July. Additional analysis by Lola Fadulu followed for the New York Times.
The day before the rule was published, Kriston Capps details the substance of the proposed rule for CityLab.
"The proposed regulation from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development would replace an Obama-era rule on disparate impact, a legal theory that has guided fair housing law for more than 50 years," writes Capps.
The new rule "would substantially raise the burden of proof for parties claiming discrimination" and also "[carve] out an unprecedented guidance for the automated decision-making systems that power the housing market. "
The article by Capps includes more details on how the new rule would change the proceedings in disparate impact cases, both on the part of plaintiffs and defendants.
As noted by Capps, the new rule is the first federal regulation "to directly address algorithms and disparate impact." That component of the new rule is the subject of more analysis written this week by Emily Badger for the New York Times.
According to Badger's article, the disparate impact controversy applies to more examples than housing: "Industry groups and conservative legal advocates have long warned that any landlord, company or city official could be accused of discrimination simply if data shows racial patterns that exist for reasons beyond their control."
"If disparate impact becomes a less viable legal tool, civil rights groups counter that it will be almost impossible to curb policies and decisions that reinforce segregation and widen the racial wealth gap. If plaintiffs must prove that someone, somewhere, explicitly intended to discriminate, they’ll never be able to police city officials who keep that intent silent — or algorithms that have no 'intent' at all," adds Badger to present the reasons why fair housing advocates are concerned about the proposed rule.
The new rule entered a 60-day comment period when it was published on Monday.