Philadelphia's controversial "Mixed-Income Housing Program" legislation has run into stiff resistance from developers and builders.
The city of Philadelphia has hit a roadblock in an attempt to approve a new inclusionary zoning ordinance.
The latest development in the unfolding saga occurred on Monday, when the City Council's Rules Committee postponed a vote on the bill by Councilmember Maria Quiñones-Sánchez until December 5. Jake Blumgart reports that the postponement came after five hours of testimony, with criticism about the bill originating from the development and building industries.
The postponement follows news from last week, also reported by Blumgart, which saw amendments "radically reshape" the bill. Also last week, "[t]he Planning Commission decided the bill needed more work and voted to place a hold on it," reports Blumgart.
Here's how Blumgart describes the changes between the original bill and the bill after the amendments made last week:
The original bill would have required any new development in Philadelphia larger than nine residential units to set aside 10 percent of the units as affordable units. Although a percentage of them could be covered by a payment into the city’s Housing Trust Fund or offered off site, some of the units had to be interspersed throughout the building. That’s why the legislation is described as a “Mixed-Income Housing Program.”
The amendments Sanchez is now offering would change all that. Developers are now allowed to opt out of on-site development completely in exchange for paying into the trust fund. The bill originally would have covered the entire city, offering different affordability limits in Center City and the rest of town. But now the bill only applies to high-density zoning districts (RM-4, RMX-3, CMX-3, CMX-4, and CMX-5), which are concentrated in Center City, University City, and along a few major thoroughfares in other neighborhoods.
After the City Council's Rule Committee hearing earlier this week, Councilmember Maria Quiñones-Sánchez is quoted saying that there isn't any new information that is likely to change the position of any interested participants in the debate.
Read the full story: Hold the zone: Vote on inclusionary zoning delayed a week in wake of opposition
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic place names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority