A newly elected member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors has proposed an expansion of rent control that would circumvent state laws that limit such measures.
Randy Shaw comments on a controversial proposal in San Francisco to expand rent control—despite a prohibition on rent control for buildings built after 1979 and for buildings under development that are built by-right. According to Shaw, "[Supervisor Aaron] Peskin correctly believes that San Francisco can require rent control and potentially even vacancy control as a condition of approving housing developments that have received special city benefits."
The article explains how the proposal would attempt to skirt state law and makes an argument for the benefits of expanded rent control. To get around the state law, the proposal would only impose rent control on buildings "that are asking the city for a significant upzoning."
"In exchange for receiving that type of major economic benefit," according to Shaw's explanation, "developers would have to agree to rent control." The article also includes more on the limitations of the proposal as well as the political path that would have to clear the way for approval.
Needless to say, the proposal is controversial. The San Francisco Chronicle editorial board produced an editorial calling the proposal a "bad idea" when it first became public news in December. Planetizen blogger Michael Lewyn has written in the past about the nearly universal opposition to rent control by economists, and as far back as 2012, multiple journalists were covering the unintended consequences of rent control in San Francisco.
Read the full story: PESKIN’S RENT CONTROL EXPANSION: WILL IT WORK?
Reevaluating Rent Control
Cities and researchers are reconsidering the effects of the controversial housing policy known as rent control.
Ground-Breaking Rent Control Project Proposed in San Francisco
California law and a local ordinance prevent new apartment buildings from falling under rent control. But that need not prevent a developer from requesting it, as a developer in San Francisco's Excelsior District has done.
Why Rent Control is a Flawed Tool
Scott James reports on the ironic application of rent control laws in San Francisco, which results in people of relatively modest means subsidizing the housing of the extraordinarily wealthy.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority