As Denver booms, planners and architects discuss the good and the bad of imposing design guidelines on new construction.
While planners have traditionally used zoning requirements to limit the size, location and layout of new projects, it has been far more difficult to find a sensible way to manage the architectural appearance of development. Ray Mark Rinaldi of The Denver Post reports on the fine line planners and city officials are trying to walk between regulating architectural design and throttling creativity.
…in Denver, where the construction boom is on and the consensus is that a lot of buildings are going up that disrespect the character of their surroundings and harm the city's image as a capital of progressive, Western living. Ugly might be hard to define, but there is widespread agreement that it's on the rise.
As new construction has popped up around Denver, the city is looking to find a way to encourage better architectural design from developers. Currently, only about 15 percent of the city is covered by some form of design review advisory board. But is an expansion of design review boards what the city needs?
Denver designer and builder Mickey Zeppelin sees the benefit and the need for design guidelines to give developers some predictability as they go through the process. However, he argues there needs to be some allowance for creativity within the guidelines. Denver planner Nore Winter, who is working with cities around the country to beef up their design standards, believes that effective design review requires not only predictability, but also competent professionals to conduct the review.
Governments and boards have to work within reasonable time frames in approving projects, so construction — which brings jobs and housing and tax revenue — isn't unduly interrupted. Review must take place at the various stages of design, from concept to permitting documents, so there are no money-losing surprises.
And possibly most important, review boards or planning staffs have to be qualified. Panels should be made up of architects, city workers and neighborhood representatives, but they have to know something about design and accept that neighborhoods will grow and change, and that taste varies.
Read the full story: Denver architecture: Would design rules create a better-looking city?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Housing is the top priority of Seattle’s sole new councilmember
Jenks campaigned on building 1,000 new units of affordable housing.
New tax cuts may slash $1.5 billion in funding for Miami transit, public parks
Amendment 3 will save Miami-Dade homeowners $2,700 in 2028.
Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania hope to finally advance climate goals post-midterms
The three states have spent years under Republican or divided control.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority