Interfacing Urban Intelligence
Shannon Mattern argues that as we enter the era of so-called “smart” cities, we need to consider the point of engagement where citizens interface with the city’s operating system.
What does a “right to the city” mean for our future cities? “Can we envision interfaces that honor the multidimensionality and collectivity of the city, the many kinds of intelligence it encompasses, and the diverse ways in which people can enact their agency as urban subjects?” And can we think beyond the screen?
Mattern presents a rubric for critically evaluating proposed interfaces such as Arup's "Smart City Melbourne" and "Urbanflow Helsinki," by Urbanscale and Nordkapp.
Full Story:
Published on Monday, April 28, 2014 in
- Get Ready, Suburbia: Apartments Are Coming
- An International 'Winner' for the Sorriest Bus Stop in America
- The Neighborhoods With the Most Millennials Are Mostly in New York and Chicago
- Everything About Tax Increment Financing
- Vacant Commercial Spaces Spreading in New York
- Study Reveals the Futility of Building Out of Congestion
- Don't Blame Climate Change for Hurricane Florence
- A Showcase of Innovative Climate Change and Resiliency Design Projects
- 5 Ways Tech Is Changing U.S. Cities
- Not All Municipalities Are Excited About the Arrival of 5G. But They May Not Have a Choice.
- Pontevedra, Spain: Where Cars Are Banned
- The Next Environmental Stewards
- Gov. Jerry Brown Signs 16 Bills to Spur Sales of New and Used Electric Vehicles
- Austin's Waitlist for Housing Vouchers Only Opens Every Four Years
- A Tale of Arts-Driven Gentrification in Northeast Minneapolis
- Making the Most of 'Opportunity Zones'
- Is the Urban-Suburban Divide Destined to Disappear?
- How to Understand Your City's Eviction Crisis
- Protected Bike Lanes: How New York City Made It Happen
- Robert Venturi, Author and Architect, Dies at 93
