Interfacing Urban Intelligence
Shannon Mattern argues that as we enter the era of so-called “smart” cities, we need to consider the point of engagement where citizens interface with the city’s operating system.
What does a “right to the city” mean for our future cities? “Can we envision interfaces that honor the multidimensionality and collectivity of the city, the many kinds of intelligence it encompasses, and the diverse ways in which people can enact their agency as urban subjects?” And can we think beyond the screen?
Mattern presents a rubric for critically evaluating proposed interfaces such as Arup's "Smart City Melbourne" and "Urbanflow Helsinki," by Urbanscale and Nordkapp.
Full Story:
Published on Monday, April 28, 2014 in
- More Evidence That New Housing Lowers Rents (Maybe)
- Another Approach to Affordable Housing
- Explained: The Common Look of the Contemporary Mid-Rise Apartment Building
- Seeing the Urban Forest for the Trees
- More Fallout From Downsizing California High-Speed Rail
- Sale of Illinois Tollway Considered to Pay Pension Debt
- Two Cities That Reduced Driving Over a Decade
- Obama Presidential Center Dealt Legal Setback
- Oregon to Consider New Densities for Transit Adjacent Neighborhoods
- Major Street Redesign Coming to Pittsburgh's Historic Strip District
- Now Illegal in D.C.: Biking With Headphones
- Voters to Decide the Legal Status of Lake Erie
- Cities' Role in Climate Governance and Global Policy: A Dispatch from the Urban20
- Report: Sprawl Affecting Farmers in Greater Washington Region
- The Potential of Shuttles Now That Chariot Is No More
- Contest: Design a Logo for New York's Privately-Owned Public Spaces
- The Artist of the Planning Department
- Coal, a Campaign Promise Unfulfilled
- Friday Fun: Oscars-Nominated Films Featuring Place in a Starring Role
- Controversy Erupts Over Sidewalk Labs Development Plans in Toronto
