Although suburbs with college campuses are often eager to zone out students, this sort of exclusionary zoning has its own negative side effects.
In Long Island where I teach, colleges and universities are engaged in a dorm-building boom—partially to attract out-of-town students, but partially because zoning rules often prevent student-oriented off-campus housing such as apartments and group houses.
The Supreme Court has upheld such zoning ordinances; in a 1974 decision upholding one Long Island suburb's right to exclude group houses, Justice Douglas wrote:
A quiet place where yards are wide, people few, and motor vehicles restricted are legitimate guidelines in a land-use project addressed to family needs...It is ample to lay out zones where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people.
Justice Douglas's decision to use "youth values" as a reason to exclude college students seems a bit bizarre to me. Nevertheless, such restrictive zoning is understandable; I suspect that the middle-aged suburban homeowners believe that college-age students are far too likely to get drunk, drive recklessly, or have noisy parties (or worse still, do all three at the same time). Moreover, high car insurance premiums for college-age drivers suggest that this prejudice is rooted in empirical reality.
On the other hand, anti-student zoning creates its own problems. If students don't have any place to live near a college, they have to commute to the college. And in the automobile-dependent suburbs of Long Island, this usually means lots of driving. So ironically, a zoning strategy designed to create places where (in Justice Douglas's words) "motor vehicles [are] restricted" in fact may create traffic jams and pollution near universities.
As noted above, on-campus housing may well solve this problem, by allowing students to get to school without driving. This strategy may work well in the long run, especially if students do not bring cars to the dormitories with them. However, a municipality cannot always rely on a university's willingness to build dormitories, since dorm construction requires time and money.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
‘Going backwards:’ Baltimore mayor, students rally against state's transit funding plan
Maryland's proposed six-year plan provides no funding for Baltimore’s BMORE bus program and reduces its road maintenance funding.
Detroit to transform waterfront with $2.2 billion investment
Developers will convert about 18 acres of unused parking lot space into civic spaces.
U.S.-Iran war may have ‘devastating’ impact on cost to warm homes
Vermont and Maine residents may see a 76% increase in the cost of warming their homes this winter.
Senate bill would ‘overhaul’ environmental permitting laws
Under the proposed act, government agencies would also not be able to suspend or rescind permits after granting them.
Exemption applications for NYC’s pied-à-terre tax see 55% success rate
The city sent nearly 40% of its initial pied-à-terre tax warnings erroneously.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
One Hundred Miles
County of Mendocino
planning NEXT
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
Montrose County
Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA)
The Pocatello Development Authority