Bring ‘em on? Planning for the Robo-cars

Now is the time for planners to engage in the public debate on vehicle-automation – leaving it to the car-makers and search-engine providers (and their legions of techies) won’t deliver the livability outcomes planners aim to achieve.

3 minute read

June 21, 2013, 4:14 AM PDT

By Scott Le Vine @scottericlevine

Planners have had a – shall we say – rocky relationship with the automobile.  The passionate love affair of the parkway-building heyday is a distant memory.  Interstate Highways are here to stay, for better or worse (perhaps with tinkering at the margins).  In the early 21st century we’ve settled into a loveless marriage: Planners recognize the car isn’t going away any time soon (a debatable proposition, in point of fact), but it is tolerated rather than embraced.  The prevailing view in the profession today is that driving is a necessary evil, to be minimized in favor of active travel and public transportation.

The ground is shifting beneath our feet, however.  Breakthroughs in sensing, processing and control technologies have brought vehicle-automation out of the realm of science fiction.  (True, the taco-copter still isn’t delivering just yet).  As many of you will know, state legislatures are beginning to regulate automated cars (the lobbyists are swarming), but the leading legal thinking is that if it ain’t explicitly prohibited – and in general it ain’t – then it’s (probably) a legal activity.

With the major technical barriers to automated-operation now addressed, the remaining challenges are still difficult, but more prosaic:

  • reliably delivering increasing levels of automation,
  • scaling-up from prototypes to the mass market,
  • identifying the appropriate role of the public and private sectors in the regulatory / legal / institutional /  insurance framework,
  • developing viable business cases (e.g. for alternative forms of vehicle-ownership),
  • managing deployment in mixed-traffic (and mixed-road-user) environments,
  • quantifying (and planning for) the implications on land use, energy consumption, and wider lifestyles,
  • and so forth.

The year’s ‘main event’ is the 2nd Annual Road Vehicle Automation Conference (, organized by the Transportation Research Board and taking place at Stanford University’s Law School from July 16th to 19th, 2013. 

Now is the time for planners to engage – leaving this to the car-makers and search-engine providers (and their legions of techies) won’t deliver the livability outcomes planners aim to achieve.  Events on-the-ground will pass us by if we ignore this trend, to the profession’s detriment. 

A sampling of impacts planners need to be thinking about: how does parking provision (and its enforcement by municipalities) change? What are the (likely countervailing) pressures for further sprawl versus more compact land use patterns? How could sleeker street design improve pedestrian connectivity? What are the realities of how people will make use of the new capabilities offered by automation – and the implications for the public realm?  And what does increasingly-intelligent and connected transportation mean for the quality-of-life of cognitively or physically disabled people?

I’m keenly looking forward to the conference’s agenda, which includes deep-dive workshops on – among a range of topics – Shared-Mobility and Transit, Energy and Environmental Impacts, and Cyber-security and System Resiliency (hacking?).  Beyond the scientific content will be the unique opportunity to demo an automated vehicle.

I hope you’re able to join us in Palo Alto, and if you will be attending please get in touch: slevine (at)

Scott Le Vine, AICP is a research associate in transport systems at Imperial College London.  He is currently preparing a Think Piece on Vehicle-Automation for the Independent Transport Commission.

Scott Le Vine

Scott Le Vine, AICP is an Assistant Professor (Urban Planning) at the State University of New York (New Paltz), a Research Associate at Imperial College London, and a Visiting Professor at Southwest Jiaotong University (Chengdu, China).

Aerial view of homes on green hillsides in Daly City, California.

Depopulation Patterns Get Weird

A recent ranking of “declining” cities heavily features some of the most expensive cities in the country — including New York City and a half-dozen in the San Francisco Bay Area.

April 10, 2024 - California Planning & Development Report

Aerial view of Oakland, California with bay in background

California Exodus: Population Drops Below 39 Million

Never mind the 40 million that demographers predicted the Golden State would reach by 2018. The state's population dipped below 39 million to 38.965 million last July, according to Census data released in March, the lowest since 2015.

April 11, 2024 - Los Angeles Times

A view straight down LaSalle Street, lined by high-rise buildings with an El line running horizontally over the street.

Chicago to Turn High-Rise Offices into Housing

Four commercial buildings in the Chicago Loop have been approved for redevelopment into housing in a bid to revitalize the city’s downtown post-pandemic.

April 10, 2024 - Chicago Construction News

Woman with long hair wearing Covid mask sitting on underground train station bench looking at her watch as subway train approaches in background at Hollywood/Western station in Los Angeles, California.

How California Transit Agencies are Addressing Rider Harassment

Safety and harassment are commonly cited reasons passengers, particularly women and girls, avoid public transit.

April 17 - The American Prospect

Nighttime view of wildfire in Los Angeles hills.

Significant Investments Needed to Protect LA County Residents From Climate Hazards

A new study estimates that LA County must invest billions of dollars before 2040 to protect residents from extreme heat, increasing precipitation, worsening wildfires, rising sea levels, and climate-induced public health threats.

April 17 - Los Angeles Times

Bird's eye view of oil field in New Mexico desert.

Federal Rule Raises Cost for Oil and Gas Extraction on Public Lands

An update to federal regulations raises minimum bonding to limit orphaned wells and ensure cleanup costs are covered — but it still may not be enough to mitigate the damages caused by oil and gas drilling.

April 17 - High Country News

News from HUD User

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Call for Speakers

Mpact Transit + Community

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Write for Planetizen

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.