A new report released by Smart Growth America evaluates the federal government's influence on America's real estate sector. With $450 billion in subsidies per year, it's clear "the communities we’ve constructed weren’t built on market demand alone."
Emily Badger discusses the findings of "Federal Involvement in Real Estate," the vital new report released today by Smart Growth America that explores the extent to which the U.S. real estate sector is "heavily influenced by direct and indirect government intervention."
"Smart Growth America’s report counted 50 federal programs that lean on the real estate scales in some way, whether through tax credits like the home mortgage interest deduction, loan guarantees through the Small Business Administration or Federal Housing Administration, or grants for low-income housing," notes Badger. The report did not account for investments by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or federally owned real estate. Nor did it assess spending on infrastructure, from highways to water treatment, that have a substantial impact on real estate location and viability.
What's clear in the aggregate is that the United States is unclear in its real estate investment policy: "Some programs seem to have outlived their original intent, while others are now working at cross purposes with today’s market demand." Despite no discernable overall strategy, "it’s clear that the federal government has favored many types of development at the expense of others." For instance, says Badger, "[t]he government dramatically favors homeowners over renters. Its support is heavily skewed toward single-family homes over multi-family developments....The mortgage interest deduction – a program first created in 1913 with the ostensible aim of boosting homeownership – curiously encourages investments in second homes."
Smart Growth America stops short of making qualitative judgements about the programs its report details. But in trying to start a conversation about the federal footprint in real estate, the study's implicit criticism "isn’t that Uncle Sam intervenes, but that he intervenes ineffectively."
"Are we really achieving what we want?" Geoffrey Anderson, the president and CEO of Smart Growth America asks. "And do we even know what we want to achieve?"
FULL STORY: How the Federal Government Dramatically Skews the U.S. Real Estate Market

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions