The Case Against Skyscrapers in Delhi
Planners and development experts explain why modeling Delhi after cities like Singapore, Hong Kon and Mumbai is misguided and dangerous.
"Before thinking of going vertical, it's important to look at the carrying capacity of the land. How can we build 200 units per acre when our infrastructure is inadequate, power supply is erratic and water is insufficient ? If you have a building with 200 units filled with people, when they all head out of the house and get into their cars, do we have the roads to support them?...
While cities like Singapore, Hong Kong and Mumbai have been cited as examples for why Delhi should go vertical, Aromar Revi, director of the Indian Institute for Human Settlement, says that, unlike Delhi, these are island cities with a paucity of space. "Delhi, on the other hand, has a large amount of space."
Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 in
Topics
- Sea-Level Rise Report: Bad News for South Florida
- CityLab Sold to Bloomberg
- The High Cost of Sprawl
- Updated: Journal Article Calls for the End of Single-Family Zoning
- 'Gentle Density' to Save Neighborhoods
- Comic Illustrates the Capitalist Co-option of Jane Jacobs's Teachings
- Development Backlash Follows Population and Job Growth in Western States
- Supreme Court Could Decide on Homeless Public Sleeping
- California's Use of the Colorado River Projected to Hit a Record Low
- San Diego Could Eliminate Height Limits Near Transit
- Cedar Rapids Unveils Sustainability Plan
- Equity in Public Spaces
- Duluth to Provide Free Land for Creative Housing Proposals
- Research Quantifies the High Price of the Massachusetts Car Economy
- Elon Musk Takes the Cybertruck for a Spin in Malibu
- Building Energy Efficiency Program Approved in Philadelphia
- Homeownership—American Dream or Nightmare?
- New North Avenue Bridge in Boston Would Ban Cars
- Noise Complaints Spike in Brooklyn After Uber Launches Helicopter Service to JFK
- First Safe Parking Lot for the Homeless Opens in San Francisco
