Should states have environmental review statutes for rezonings?

After reading an article on the misuse of CEQA in California,* I took a short look at New York law.  In New York, city planners must prepare an environmental assessment when property is rezoned, and must prepare a more detailed environmental impact statement (EIS) if property has a significant effect on the environment.  

2 minute read

November 14, 2011, 4:54 PM PST

By Michael Lewyn @mlewyn


After reading an article on the misuse of CEQA in California,* I took a short look at New York law.  In New York, city planners must prepare an environmental assessment when property is rezoned, and must prepare a more detailed environmental impact statement (EIS) if property has a significant effect on the environment.  

For example, my property law textbook has the case of Fisher v. Giuliani (720 NYS 2d 50).**  In that case, the city sought to allow additional development in certain parts of Manhattan's Theater District.  According to the court, the rezoning "did modestly increase the density of particular sites via the transfer of development rights from theaters"- in other words, it allowed development to be transferred from blocks containing historic theaters to other blocks.   The city prepared a 75-page environmental assessment.   This assessment, however, was not enough for the local Not-In-My-Back-Yard lobby, which argued that a full-scale EIS was needed. 

A New York trial court also endorsed a full-scale EIS, holding that the rezoning would create a significant impact because they would "stimulate development"- something that would be true of any upzoning, anywhere, anyplace, anytime.  The New York appellate courts disagreed- but not until three years after the city approved the rezoning.

What do I get out of this case?  First, that in states with environmental review statutes, any rezoning, anywhere, may be subject to years of bureaucratic review and court challenges that would not occur in other states.  

Second, it seems to me that because developers in such states will need to wait for environmental assessment (and maybe for an environmental impact statement as well), environmental review statutes will therefore discourage any development requiring a rezoning, thus constricting the supply and raising the cost of both residential and commercial development.  

Third, I suspect that the environmental review process may encourage development to shift towards outer suburbs.  Here's why: I would guess that infill development is probably more likely to require rezoning than "greenfield" development of semirural areas, and is certainly less likely to attract neighborhood opposition since in the latter type of area fewer people are around to complain.  Thus, the environmental review process may reduce infill development more than it reduces greenfield development.   Having said that, I don't wish to overstate my case: New York and California are certainly high-cost states, but I am not sure how much of this high cost is related to environmental review status.  Moreover, the central cities in California and New York (well, downstate New York anyhow) are healthier than those of many other states, indicating that if environmental review statutes favor sprawl, their impact is not enormous.  

*http://www.planetizen.com/node/52413

**http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail… 


Michael Lewyn

Michael Lewyn is a professor at Touro University, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, in Long Island. His scholarship can be found at http://works.bepress.com/lewyn.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Cover CM Credits, Earn Certificates, Push Your Career Forward

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

July 16, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Green vintage Chicago streetcar from the 1940s parked at the Illinois Railroad Museum in 1988.

Chicago’s Ghost Rails

Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.

July 13, 2025 - WTTV

Blue and silver Amtrak train with vibrant green and yellow foliage in background.

Amtrak Cutting Jobs, Funding to High-Speed Rail

The agency plans to cut 10 percent of its workforce and has confirmed it will not fund new high-speed rail projects.

July 14, 2025 - Smart Cities Dive

Worker in yellow safety vest and hard hat looks up at servers in data center.

Ohio Forces Data Centers to Prepay for Power

Utilities are calling on states to hold data center operators responsible for new energy demands to prevent leaving consumers on the hook for their bills.

July 18 - Inside Climate News

Former MARTA CEO Collie Greenwood standing in front of MARTA HQ with blurred MARTA sign visible in background.

MARTA CEO Steps Down Amid Citizenship Concerns

MARTA’s board announced Thursday that its chief, who is from Canada, is resigning due to questions about his immigration status.

July 18 - WABE

Rendering of proposed protected bikeway in Santa Clara, California.

Silicon Valley ‘Bike Superhighway’ Awarded $14M State Grant

A Caltrans grant brings the 10-mile Central Bikeway project connecting Santa Clara and East San Jose closer to fruition.

July 17 - San José Spotlight