Counting the Costs of California's Prop. 26
In California, passage of Proposition 26 has raised the question of whether fees used for public services will be jeopardized at the local level. Some argue most fees will be unaffected, but others could take a hit.
"But veteran municipal lawyer Michael G. Colantuono said the proposition is likely to bring significant change in a handful of cases.
Colantuono, part of a League of California Cities task force analyzing Proposition 26, said the measure could affect fees charged by public power utilities, park districts and business improvement districts, to name a few.
Most at risk: fees collected and spent in a way that does not directly benefit only those who pay."
Discounts and other subsidies previously offered through power utilities, for example, could be cut.
Published on Monday, November 22, 2010 in
- Google's San Jose Transit Village Plans Revealed
- The Varied Career of a Transit Service Planner
- The Life and Death of Neighborhood Rebrandings
- City to Bicyclists: Berkeley Not in Idaho
- 150 Acres of Undeveloped Land to Become 2,350 Homes Outside Denver
- France's Transit Ridership Booms as the USA's Busts
- Kanye West's Unpermitted Vision for Housing Utopia Has Been Demolished
- The Great Flood of 2019, Visualized
- The High Cost of Cool Air
- California Cities That Plan Housing Might Now Have to Build it
- First Steps to Combat Homelessness in Denver Suburbs
- Watch What Happens When Parking Disappears From an Amsterdam Street
- U.S. EPA Report Assists the Water Reuse Cause
- $14 Billion Deal for Texas High-Speed Rail Construction
- Environmental Law, Resistance to Trump Administration Splits California Democrats
- 2021 Opening Expected for San Francisco's Central Subway
- 'No Crossing' Signs in Portland Limit the Public Way, Say Critics
- Increasing Passenger Rail Service from Pittsburgh Would Be Costly, Studies Show
- Revel Mopeds, a New Addition to the Micromobility Landscape
- $51 Billion Capital Investment Plan Sets Records for New York MTA
