The City That Killed Michael Jackson
Michael Jackson's life would have been incredibly different (read: more normal) and lasted longer if he lived in New York instead of L.A., argues Gigi Levangie Grazer. She says the isolating qualities of L.A. enabled the downfall of the King of Pop.
"What happened to Michael Jackson could only happen in Los Angeles - a city where elegant, moneyed suburbia, and its favorite accessory and most insidious symptom - the elaborately gated community - isolate its residents. Eventually, it was his isolation that ruined his life, that attracted those who could further isolate him, that killed him."
Had he lived in New York, she argues, Jackson wouldn't have been able to maintain such a bizarre private lifestyle.
Published on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 in
Topics
- New Tallest Building West of the Mississippi Now Open
- McMansion Hell Blog in Legal Hot Water with Real Estate Site Zillow
- San Diego, Marin County Heading the Opposite Direction on Housing Policy
- Bloomberg Announces $200 Million 'American Cities Initiative'
- Cities Seeking New Weapons in the Battle Against Waze-Induced Traffic
- Bike-Lash Erasing Baltimore's New Bike Infrastructure
- The New Apple Store in Chicago Looks a lot Like a Laptop
- Los Angeles Councilmember Chooses the Side of Traffic Safety
- An Expanding Vision for San Francisco's Treasure Island
- Friday Fun: A Mario Kart Tour of Japan
- Los Angeles' New Tower and the Silly Rules That Govern Building Height
- Union Strike Halts Construction in Philadelphia
- Louisville's Sprawl Threatens One of its Last Clean-Running Streams
- Transit's No Good, Very Bad Day
- $6 Million: The Cost of Removing the Trump Brand from Toronto Hotel
- With Resources Scarce, Bridge-Builders Cultivate Creativity
- Black Home Ownership Rates in Seattle's King County Continue to Shrink
- The Dutch: Ready to Export Their Flood Control Expertise
- Public Engagement Helping Pittsburgh-Area Bus Rapid Transit Proposal Take Shape
- Who's Mapping Gentrification, and Where?
