Debunking The Myths About TOD

<p>Responding to critics of Denver's planned TOD developments, TOD expert John Renne responds to four common misconceptions about transit-oriented development.</p>
May 19, 2008, 11am PDT | Christian Madera | @cpmadera
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments

"Dr. John L. Renne, an assistant professor of Urban Planning and Transportation Studies at the University of New Orleans, says that despite what some people believe, transit oriented developments can help protect the rural and suburban nature of communities surrounding Denver.

Tenet # 1 - TODs do nothing to curb sprawl

TOD is not the silver bullet, but its part of the solution. Let me give you an analogy. A person that weighs 300 lbs. and is on the verge of a heart attack cannot solve their problems with just taking a few magic pills. They must change their lifestyle by exercising, a change in diet, and possible some medicine. Our cities are unhealthy. Transit and TOD are an important part of the solution, but they are not a panacea.


Tenet # 3 - Nonpolluting electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles will make TOD unnecessary in the future.
Even if cars could run on air with no negative by-products, TODs are still needed because of traffic...Also, what are you going to do when you get to the age that you can no longer drive? Many studies show that the isolation of seniors in car-dependent neighborhoods is a big problem and will only worsen in the future. AARP is now promoting TOD as a needed alternative so that seniors can have mobility options as they age. TODs encourage a healthier lifestyle by allowing for residents to get more active transport (ie. walking and biking) in their daily routine. Studies show this to be part of the reason that Europeans live longer and spend less on health care per capita than Americans."

Full Story:
Published on Friday, May 16, 2008 in The Rocky Mountain News
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email