State Versus Local Planning
An unintended consequence of Proposition 13, which limits local governments’ ability to impose taxes, is more State decisionmaking for local planning efforts.
There is an emerging pattern of state legislature intervention in local planning matters that, until recently, were previously handled by local government representatives. Examples of state intervention include development of a new LA County hospital in East Los Angeles, land use decisions in San Bernardino County, revisions to San Francisco's International airport, and others. Dan Walters asks if this is an appropriate role for state government.
Thanks to Chris Steins
Full Story:
Published on Thursday, June 15, 2000 in
Topics
- Home Builders Aren't Building the Smaller Homes the Market Wants
- Recycling Is Cancelled
- Study: Density Can Impede Growth
- 'Urban Luxury' Housing Skyrockets in Texas and Beyond
- Seattle Gives Final Approval to 27 Upzones
- The Case for Fourplexes in Portland
- Many Norms, Few Plans: Urban Rubble Clearance in the Cities of the Global South
- Concrete’s Contribution to the Rise and Decline of Civilization
- Chinese Cities Build Big Despite Shedding Residents
- Scrutiny for HUD Secretary Ben Carson's Schedule
- Bipartisan Support for Federal Diesel Emissions Reduction Bill
- Washington State Needs Funding to Address Culvert Issue
- Jeep Plant Isn't Getting a Warm Reception From Detroit Residents
- The Cuyahoga River Once Caught Fire, Now its Fish Are Safe to Eat
- The Resilience of Culture
- A New Look at Causes and Effects of Pollution, From Production to Consumption
- At World Oil Conference, No One Questioned Climate Change Science
- Ottawa Light Rail On Track to Expand
- New Dog Park a First for Downtown Phoenix
- San Diego Unbundles Parking, Eliminates Parking Minimums and Sets Maximums
