More analysis and more equity will be required for Palo Alto to finally adopt a Housing Element that complies with state laws.

For a second time, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has rejected a Housing Element from the city of Palo Alto in accordance with the Regional Housing Needs Assessment process. The city adopted the most recent Housing Element in May and had already begun the process of revamping its zoning code to meet its goals for 6,000 new housing units in the next eight years.
According to an article by Gennady Sheyner for the Palo Alto Weekly, the Housing Element rejected by the HCD calls for “raising the allowed density in multi-family zones and encouraging residential construction in historically commercial areas in the southeast portion for the city, around San Antonio Road and Fabian Way.” The Housing Element also expands the city’s new Housing Incentive Program (HIP), “which grants density and height bonuses, as well as other zoning breaks, to housing developers,” according to Sheyner.
“The letter from the HCD does not take issue with any of these proposed programs and concurs that the HIP is a great tool for housing developments,” report Sheyner. “The agency also found, however, that the city has not done enough to prove that the non-vacant sites on the city’s adopted housing inventory are actually suitable for housing.”
“The HCD also found that the city has not sufficiently analyzed some of the existing commercial zones for potential addition of residential use,” adds Sheyner.
The HCD first rejected Palo Alto’s Housing Element in March, before the city adopted its revised Housing Element in May. The city has until Jan. 31 to complete a compliant Housing Element. Until them, the city is subject to “Builder’s Remedy” proposals that are not subject to the boundaries set by local zoning laws. According to Sheyner, the city already has four such proposals in the pipeline.
FULL STORY: State again rejects Palo Alto's housing plan

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)