Op-Ed: Instead of a New VMT Tax, Raise the Gas Tax

Implementing a tax based on miles traveled could disincentivize purchasing more efficient cars and would do little to improve road safety, one columnist argues.

2 minute read

August 20, 2021, 8:00 AM PDT

By Diana Ionescu @aworkoffiction


Texas Highways

TBaker770 / Shutterstock

"Americans are increasingly driving hybrid and electric-only cars, reducing emissions and curbing gasoline consumption — accomplishing key goals of the Biden administration," writes Justin B. Hollander. But "[i]mposing a new Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) tax," included in the infrastructure bill passed by the Senate last week, "would likely flush away all those prior investments in efficiency and remove much of the incentive for someone to purchase and operate a hybrid or electric-only car." 

"Presently, the 18.4 cents (or 24.4 cents for diesel) per gallon gas tax generates over $30 billion annually to help pay for a range of highway, rail and other transit costs," but "critics worry that our increasingly fuel-efficient vehicles, move towards fully electric cars and a decline in overall car use threaten the fiscal future of national transportation funding." In Hollander's view, "the answer for the U.S. DOT is to simply increase the gas tax and get more cars off our roads."

"The gas tax has been shown in numerous research studies to be an effective policy tool that discourages driving and encourages the use of public transit. If the U.S. DOT needs more money, then they ought to seek out congressional support for raising the gas tax — it has not increased since 1993,"  argues Hollander. "Create a brand new, national-level taxation system based on vehicle miles traveled and you will discourage the use of environmentally friendly cars and do nothing to actually make us safer from the hazards of cars and trucks."

Thursday, August 12, 2021 in The Hill

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

October 28, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A car drives through a puddle, making a large splash. Rain pours down.

California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour

If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.

October 28, 2026 - Grist

Lake Powell with much of the water evaporated.

Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River

Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.

October 30, 2026 - Yale Environment 360

People vote in Chicago behind blue privacy screens

Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners

Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents

November 5 - Block Club Chicago

Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks into a microphone. He wears a gray suit.

NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting

New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.

November 5 - The City Reporter

People in Los Angeles going to the polls, following a sign with an "I Voted" design

California appears to reject Prop. 45

The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.

November 5 - Cal Matters