Developers are frequently cast as a kind of monolithic bad guy in the politics of development, but developers are cut from different cloths, each with distinct interests and motivations.

Daniel Herriges shares a schema that can help people understand the world of real estate development—namely, that not all developers are alike.
There are three distinct varieties of developer, according to Herriges, each operating on a different business model. "They build different types of buildings, in different places. They use different sources of financing. Local rules and regulations affect these different groups very differently, and—importantly—their interests often do not align," writes Herriges.
So what are these three kinds of developers? Herriges lists residential developers types as follows: 1) big national homebuilders, like Lennar, Pulte, and D.R. Horton; 2) the "big urban box" developers that are smaller than the national builders but still likely to have a major influence over politics at the local and regional level; and then there are the 3) incremental infill developers. Herriges notes that there are also three types of commercial developers, but keeps the focus of this article on residential developers.
To further elucidate the differences between these three kinds of developers, Herriges digs into the business models of each type, identifying fundamental differences between each of them. But most helpfully, Herriges also devotes significant attention to the question of why these distinctions matter—the answer is immediately apparent in the lack of alignment in the interests of each of these three kinds of developers.
FULL STORY: There Are 3 Different Kinds of Developers

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Walmart Announces Nationwide EV Charging Network
The company plans to install electric car chargers at most of its stores by 2030.

Chicago Approves Green Affordable Housing Plan
The Mayor’s plan calls for creating a nonprofit housing corporation tasked with building affordable housing that meets Green Building standards.

E-Scooter Parking: A Guide
How smart planning — and ample designated parking — can end conflicts over shared scooters.

‘It’s Been 50 years’: Public Transit Law Passes in Montana
Legislation would fix transportation district issue, allow for greater reach on city bus routes.

Top 10 Tech-Ready Cities
An index ranks U.S. cities based on their preparedness for the ‘smart city future.’
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Moorpark
City of Tustin
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions