Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
China's Climate Change Paradox
Last month, "President Xi Jinping of China promised that his country would take a “driving seat in international cooperation to respond to climate change,” reports Somini Sengupta on Nov 14 for The New York Times.
But can China really be in the “driving seat” when it is burning so much coal that its carbon emissions are forecast to rise this year?
The annual update by the Global Carbon Project, published Nov. 13, projects these changes in carbon dioxide emissions from the three largest emitting countries, the European Union, and the 'rest of the world':
- China (10.5 Gt CO2; +3.5%),
- India (2.5 Gt CO2; +2.0%),
- United States (5.3 Gt CO2; −0.4%),
- European Union (3.5 Gt CO2; −0.2%),
- and the rest of the world (15.1 Gt CO2; +2.3%). ['ROW' in graph below]
Source: IOP Science
Notwithstanding the 3.5 percent increase, "China...is well on track to meet the commitments it made under the Paris climate accord...," notes Sengupta. "The bar, it turns out, is pretty low."
The increase is blamed on coal, but experts and observers don't appear particularly worried because of energy policies the country, the world's largest coal consumer by far, has adopted and because it meets their air quality goals which are more pressing than climate change.
“China can continue to play a leading role in the global climate debate, despite this short-term increase of emissions, which is temporary,” he said.
Another paradox: While China attempts to wean itself off coal by investing in renewable energy, "it is building coal plants abroad as part of an ambitious 'One Belt, One Road' initiative, designed to expand Chinese global influence," observes Sengupta.
As for alternatives to being the world leader in fighting climate change, Lisa Friedman reports on four, in addition to Xi Jinping, for The New York Times on Nov. 12.
Hat tip to Mark Boshnack.