Drivers sometimes defend speeding by arguing that it is safe as long as other drivers are also speeding. This argument only makes sense in the context of a limited-access highway.

As street safety advocates have repeatedly pointed out, speed kills: in particular, a pedestrian struck by a car going 40 miles per hour is far more likely to die than one struck by a car going 20 miles per hour.
But I’m not sure how many motorists realize this. A common perspective was once stated by a relative of mine: “Speeding isn’t dangerous. What’s dangerous is when one person is going more slowly than everyone else.” For example, when other drivers are going 60 miles per hour, and one person is going only 30 miles per hour, the fast drivers might be more likely to rear-end the slow driver, because they are expecting the slow driver to go at their speed. Thus, fatalities are least likely when everyone is driving 60 miles per hour.
This argument might make sense in the context of a limited-access highway. On such a highway, it is reasonable for a driver to expect all road users to be traveling at roughly the speed limit (or maybe even a little faster). Moreover, a lower speed limit might have fairly modest safety benefits, because even a motorist struck by someone going slowly by highway standards (that is, 40 or 50 miles per hour) is still reasonably likely to die or be seriously injured.
By contrast, other types of streets are full of slow-moving, vulnerable road users: not just pedestrians and cyclists, but also cars that are slowly turning into a store or intersection, or cars stopped waiting for a light to change or waiting to yield to oncoming traffic. In such a situation, it is not practical to expect everyone to go the same speed, and a reasonable driver would be aware of this fact. It logically follows that on regular streets full of walkers and stopped cars, speed kills: that is, a street where drivers go 40 miles per hour is likely to be the site of far more death and injury than a street with slower traffic.

Trump Administration Could Effectively End Housing Voucher Program
Federal officials are eyeing major cuts to the Section 8 program that helps millions of low-income households pay rent.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Ken Jennings Launches Transit Web Series
The Jeopardy champ wants you to ride public transit.

Driving Equity and Clean Air: California Invests in Greener School Transportation
California has awarded $500 million to fund 1,000 zero-emission school buses and chargers for educational agencies as part of its effort to reduce pollution, improve student health, and accelerate the transition to clean transportation.

Congress Moves to End Reconnecting Communities and Related Grants
The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee moved to rescind funding for the Neighborhood Equity and Access program, which funds highway removals, freeway caps, transit projects, pedestrian infrastructure, and more.

From Throughway to Public Space: Taking Back the American Street
How the Covid-19 pandemic taught us new ways to reclaim city streets from cars.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Ada County Highway District
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
