California's historic drought might have been greatly relieved by last year's abundantly rainy season, but there are more drought years to come, along with more questions about how the state will manage its water resources.

Jay Lund, professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of California – Davis, and director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences, pens an op-ed for the California WaterBlog that lists eight of the most "dangerous" ideas in water management, specific to California's situation.
The list builds from a fundamental premise that water policy requires a broad consensus. In California, however, "people often seem to group themselves into communities of interests and ideology, which see complex water problems differently." Those groups each have their own, non-scientific ideas about water management, and Lund argues that such self interest can "ultimately become dangerous even to their advocates…"
Lund's eight "dangerous ideas" are as follows, with more detail in the article:
- There is a silver bullet solution.
- I win if you lose.
- We can "Solve or "fix" water problems.
- Someone else should pay.
- Regulation will protect the environment.
- We were promised.
- We need trust.
- It will work as planned.
An additional post for the On the Public Record blog piggybacked on Lund's list, adding a few of its own. Three additional items, in fact, include more detail in the source post:
- That conventional growth predictions are immutable and will pose new demand that we must meet.
- That water markets are a neutral, non-coercive way to reallocate water supplies.
- That California should grow all profitable foodstuffs.
FULL STORY: We hold our convenient truths to be self-evident – Dangerous ideas in California water

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking
Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

Cal Fire Chatbot Fails to Answer Basic Questions
An AI chatbot designed to provide information about wildfires can’t answer questions about evacuation orders, among other problems.

What Happens if Trump Kills Section 8?
The Trump admin aims to slash federal rental aid by nearly half and shift distribution to states. Experts warn this could spike homelessness and destabilize communities nationwide.

Sean Duffy Targets Rainbow Crosswalks in Road Safety Efforts
Despite evidence that colorful crosswalks actually improve intersection safety — and the lack of almost any crosswalks at all on the nation’s most dangerous arterial roads — U.S. Transportation Secretary Duffy is calling on states to remove them.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Gallatin County Department of Planning & Community Development
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie