Last year, the "innovation district" rose to prominence as a way to describe urban knowledge economy epicenters. This report from Bruce Katz and Brookings describes how the phenomenon continues to evolve.

Unlike the suburban office parks associated with tech firms, today's innovation district is central and urbane, boasting an equal spread of MacBook entrepreneurs and baristas. According to this article, there's not a lot to complain about. "The growing application of 'open innovation'—where companies work with other firms, inventors, and researchers to generate new ideas and bring them to market—has revalued proximity, density, and other attributes of cities."
The phenomenon has been quick to spread. "A simple Google search will reveal the extent to which the language of 'innovation districts' (or 'innovation quarters,' 'innovation neighborhoods,' or 'innovation corridors') has rapidly permeated the field of urban and metropolitan economic development and place-making.
Several observations from the article about how innovation districts are evolving:
- In some cases, the label "innovation district" has been misapplied by regions seeking to drive up demand and attract high-value enterprises.
- Innovation districts aren't necessarily yoked to existing knowledge centers, i.e. university campuses. This is a good thing.
- Some ostensible innovation centers need to become friendlier to networking. "When designed and programmed well, a district's public spaces facilitate open innovation by offering numerous opportunities to meet, network, and brainstorm [...] districts anchored by medical campuses have significant work ahead."
- Intermediaries (cultivators, incubators, accelerators) are becoming crucial enablers for collaboration between firms.
- Innovation districts must "ensure that nearby neighborhoods and their residents connect to and benefit from new growth opportunities in innovation districts and beyond. Scaling such efforts will be critical in the years to come, as the success of these districts will be defined in large part by their broader city and regional impacts."
FULL STORY: One year after: Observations on the rise of innovation districts

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Maryland Awards $1.25M in TOD-Related Grants
The state’s DOT is funding projects that prepare sites around transit stations for future mixed-use development and housing.

Judge Rules in Favor of Massachusetts TOD Law
The court rejected an argument that the MBTA Communities law, which requires zoning for multifamily housing, is an “unfunded mandate.”

Supporting Cycling Takes More Than Just Bike Lanes
Safe, protected bike lanes are a key part of a city’s bike infrastructure — but secure parking, e-bike charging, and other amenities can also influence people’s shift to cycling.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)