Ask the Ethicist: What to Do When You Hear Internal Alarm Bells

The first in a new series by Planetizen: "Ask the Ethicist," featuring the advice of our resident expert: Carol D. Barrett, FAICP, author of "Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners."

2 minute read

March 24, 2015, 6:00 AM PDT

By Carol Barrett


Three Wise Mokeys

MichaelMaggs / Wikimedia Commons

"Ask the Ethicist" allows planners to pose tough questions regarding ethical practices in planning to our resident expert: Carol D. Barrett, FAICP, author of Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners.

Question: I'm a planner in the local city Planning Department. I recently received a communication from one the members of our city's planning commission regarding a property he intends to buy from a family member once a new zoning code amendment goes into effect. Should I report this as a conflict of interest, or is it "business as usual"? 

Carol Barrett: The short answers to the two questions are, in order, "yes" to the conflict of interest and "no" to the business as usual.

In responding in such situations, I always try to give the benefit of the doubt and offer information that will help someone become aware that what they are contemplating is not ethical.

In this case, you already have some sort of relationship with the commissioner because he felt comfortable giving you a call. You can respond with a phone call back that covers some of the basics, such as the requirements under the Fair Political Practices Act to provide an annual list of any property owned (other than a single family home) and the need to refrain from participating in any decision that could directly impact the value of the property. I’d express it in terms like, "You may not have yet had a chance to think about the…"   

Although the property is not yet owned, the right thing to do is for the commissioner to not vote on a rezoning because the purchase is contingent on the outcome of the commission's action. This will protect both the integrity of the commissioner and the entire Planning Commission. I would also document this conversation in a memo to the file. If you are not a supervising planner, then this should also be reviewed with someone higher in the pecking order to protect yourself. My next phone call would be to arrange for some training for the entire Planning Commission on conflicts-of-interest. An ounce of training can help prevent a pound of corruption.

You should always trust that internal alarm that starts ringing when you get these kinds of inquiries. Congratulations to you for heeding the clanging bell. 

[Editor's note: If you have an ethical quandary for consideration, please email [email protected] and include "Ask the Ethicist" in the headline. We will ensure anonymity of all parties. In the meantime, be sure to read the AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct.]


Carol Barrett

Carol Barrett started thinking and writing about ethics the first time she was ordered to do something illegal as a newly minted planning director in 1983. Since then she has spent time researching, writing, and teaching about planning ethics from the point of view of the practicing planner. She is a regular guest speaker at conferences and in classrooms around the country. She identifies "planning ethics" as her hobby when filling out questionnaires.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Cover CM Credits, Earn Certificates, Push Your Career Forward

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

June 11, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Metrorail train pulling into newly opened subterranean station in Washington, D.C. with crowd on platform taking photos.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”

The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

June 2, 2025 - The Hill

Large crowd on street in San Francisco, California during Oktoberfest festival.

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns

In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

June 2, 2025 - Robbie Silver

Color-coded map of labor & delivery departments and losses in United States.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace

In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

June 15 - Maine Morning Star

Street scene in Kathmandu, Nepal with yellow minibuses and other traffic.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs

Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

June 15 - Fast Company

Bike lane in Washington D.C. protected by low concrete barriers.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint

Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.

June 15 - The Washington Post