Earlier this month the Energy Department pulled the plug on the FutureGen "clean coal" project. The media has been sifting through the ashes to make sense of where the project went wrong.
Timothy Cama sets the stakes in the demise of FutureGen, a much ballyhooed "clean coal" project once thought of as the future of the fossil fuel industry: "The Energy Department’s decision this week to pull the plug on a major 'clean coal' demonstration project stands as the latest setback for a technology that only recently held promise as a key piece of the United States’ fight against climate change."
Cama's coverage of the project's demise explores the response of industry groups, which "are seizing on the decision to scrap the years-old initiative as more evidence of the Obama administrations 'war on coal.'" Cama, however, quotes Howard Herzog, a research engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, to express some skepticism of that charge.
Joe Romm covers the challenges facing carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology, which was meant to have its largest-scale showcase with the FutureGen project. According to Romm, "CCS is unlikely to provide more than 10 percent of the answer to the carbon problem by 2050" because of lackluster interest in the technology from the private sector.
Valerie Vocovici and Ayesha Rocce report on the legal implications of the decision to pull the plug on the project—especially that the decision might bolster the case of legal challenges to the U.S. EPA's proposed regulations for coal plant carbon emissions.
Read the full story: Clean coal setback fuels industry attacks
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority