The GOP-backed 2015 Appropriations Bill would cut funding for TIGER grants, historically a friend to cities and metro areas looking for funding for multi-modal programs, and make it, essentially, a roads program.
The House Appropriations Committee released the "Fiscal Year 2015 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Bill" earlier this week, following last week's Transportation Department's GROW AMERICA proposal for authorization of the Transportation Bill. Tanya Snyder, reporting for Streetsblog USA, details the disappointment to be found in the bill for advocates of multi-modal transportation spending. "While previous GOP appropriations proposals have eliminated TIGER grant funding altogether, this proposal allocates $100 million for TIGER, down from the $600 million the program got this year. More horrifically, the GOP proposes to limit TIGER grants to projects that 'address critical transportation needs,' defined as roads and bridges, ports and freight rail."
"And just to be clear about what they mean, the GOP adds, 'The legislation does not allow these funds to be used for non-essential purposes, such as street-scaping, or bike and pedestrian paths.' Also ineligible are transit projects that would be eligible for New Starts or other FTA grants, carpool projects, ADA compliance for sidewalks, highway and transit safety improvements, planning, congestion mitigation, intelligent transportation systems, anything related to congestion pricing (including electric toll collection and travel demand management), or recreational trails."
As a counterpoint, the Obama Administrations proposal, released last week and assumed to be dead on arrival, would double the TIGER program. To keep the GOP Appropriations proposal in perspective—the bill is contingent on authorization guiding transportation spending for 2015, of which there is none, yet. As Snyder says: "Nothing can be appropriated that isn’t authorized."
FULL STORY: GOP Appropriations Bill Would Turn TIGER Into a Roads Program

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions